Saturday, October 13, 2012

Way to go, Hugo! (Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox: 14 Oct 2012)

Venezuelans Celebrating!

Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox
Sunday, October 14, 2012

Way to Go, Hugo!
What Honest Elections Look Like

Special Guest:
Venezuelan/American Attorney/Author
Eva Golinger
La Eva


2PM (PACIFIC)


OR CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD AND LISTEN
ANYTIME

Friday, October 12, 2012

Abby Martin Interviews Cindy Sheehan On "Breaking The Set"


Abby Martin interviews anti-war activist and vice-presidential candidate for the Peace and Freedom Party, Cindy Sheehan, discussing the left-right paradigm and the wars in the Middle East.

LIKE Breaking The Set @ http://fb.me/BreakingTheSet
FOLLOW Abby Martin @ http://twitter.com/AbbyMartin

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Me for VP by Cindy Sheehan


Okay, yes I know that elections are compromised
and heavily in favor of the Robber Class.

Yes, I loathe this government and 99% of what it does and stands for.

Yes, there really is no serious campaign to speak of from my running-mate.

However, I just got my Sample Ballot in the mail and I am still 
a big enough political nerd to think this is cool.

I am running on a presidential ticket from a party that has a serious platform and some admirable history:
The Peace and Freedom Party.

Despite everything, I will be voting for my ticket.



 

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

ARGO: Ben Affleck's latest film may whitewash CIA history

Guest commentary by Patrice Greanville reprinted with permission.

ARGO: Ben Affleck’s latest film may whitewash CIA history

 
Print Friendly
There are films that simply should not be made, and this is clearly one of them. The historical context in which a work of mass communication is created and distributed should be taken into account by morally responsible artists. It rarely is.

Bryan Cranston. and Affleck (as Mendez).

By Patrice Greanville
 

FILM BLITZ REVIEWS: ARGO [2012]


Ben Affleck’s latest actioner using the Iran hostage crisis as a backdrop may hit the mark as a thriller but misses the target big time by serving as a propaganda vehicle for US war in that region.

Synopsis

Already hailed as one of the year’s best, Argo is a 2012 American political thriller film directed by Ben Affleck (and co-produced by George Clooney, whose fascination with shady intel ops and Middle East intrigue is rather notable).  The film is loosely based on a true story, CIA “exfiltration expert” Tony Mendez’s account of the rescue of six U.S. diplomats from Tehran, Iran at the height of the 1979 “Iran hostage crisis”. The film stars Affleck, Bryan Cranston, Alan Arkin and John Goodman. The film is scheduled for release in the United States on October 12, 2012.

What’s so bloody wrong with this film

TIMING

Appearing in late 2012, prior to the US presidential election, and in the midst of an all-out propaganda campaign to demonize Iran and take America to war against that long-victimized country (a stealthy dirty war of sabotage and assassination has been waged against Iran for quite some time now by NATO assets and the Mossad, with probably ample support from the Gulf royal mafia), the film can only add fuel–what else–to the flames. This film, under the guise of a thriller, can only exacerbate anti-Iranian feeling in America and elsewhere, and, in passing, perhaps as an unwitting bonus, give the sinister CIA a cuddly wink of approval.  Which is exactly what you’d expect from 
nincompoop liberals like Affleck and Clooney.


MISDIRECTED TALENT

As film-makers Affleck (just check out The Town, a taut, absorbing heist thriller he helmed in 2010) and Clooney (Good Night, and Good Luck, Syriana) are on solid ground.  Their acting, producing and directorial chops command respect and they are still maturing as artists. Unfortunately the same can’t be said for their political vision, or shall we call it…tact? For what kind of self-indulgent blindness causes otherwise smart individuals like Affleck and Clooney to suddenly become oblivious to the possibly harmful social and political repercussions of their work?  We’re not talking here about being blind to issues like widespread hunger or gay rights violations, which, as card-carrying centrist liberals, both vociferously (and correctly) agitate against. With vehicles like Argo they’re messing with international politics, with the laws of the universe…entering the sphere of grand propaganda, and serving as clueless handmaidens to US foreign policy, especially when they clamor for intervention for “humanitarian reasons” in Libya, Syria, Darfur, etc. (the latest Hollywood fad), thereby providing cover for Washington’s own criminal agenda in precisely those regions.  Clichéd as it sounds, as far as the ruling cliques are concerned, if Hollywood liberals didn’t exist they’d have to be invented.

BAD CELLULOID

Argo is bad cinema. Not qua technique, nor acting, nor any of the many other categories by which a complex work like a film is normally judged. Argo is bad because it is a toxic social product. By raising still higher the probability of a horrendous war in the Gulf, by glorifying what Western intelligence agencies actually do in our name, Affleck and Clooney are not doing us any favors, and no amount of entertainment can justify such undertakings. If they really sat down and thought about it perhaps they might finally get it, but I doubt it.  Insulated, privileged creatures like big Hollywood celebs are largely immune to the deeper political truths that define the planet’s current dilemmas. In any case, whatever Argo’s cinematic value, this is a film to avoid. Political obtuseness, artistic vanity, or worse—witting complicity with the forces that are bringing this poor world to a tragic end—are not to be rewarded.

Of course, as usual, I probably am pretty much alone in thinking this way.

Media critic Patrice Greanville is founding editor of Cyrano’s Journal Today and The Greanville Post.

Cindy Puts in the Time, are you able to chip in a "Dime?"

"The true foundation of liberty is disobedience, the obedient must be slaves." Henry David Thoreau

 Vandenberg AFB, February 2012

Dear Friends, 

Since my son was killed in Iraq in April of 2004, I have marched a thousand miles for peace and justice; given a thousand speeches around the world; received dozens of awards for my peace work, maintain my weekly podcast; run for federal office (twice); written a thousand articles and six books (the 7th one is on the way); and been arrested about 20 times (I lost count).

Some of the arrests have literally been pieces of cake--like my most recent one up in Bangor, Washington on August 6th, when we were protesting at the nuclear sub base--but some have been horrifying and have taken awhile to recover from. Like the time an NYPD jerk dragged me about 20 feet and dislocated my shoulder and gave me a concussion; or the time I was subjected to subhuman conditions in Waco, Texas--or the time I spent the night in an overcrowded, squalid cell in Sacramento, California. As bad as some of the experiences have been--I feel it is my duty as a good citizen of this planet to confront these bad citizens who create war and wreak economic and environmental havoc on MY PLANET! 

Currently, I have two cases pending in Federal Court (for the arrest at Vandenberg--trial next week; and my ongoing persecution by the IRS for my principled act of war-tax resistance), and while the physical toll varies, the financial burden is getting harder. 

The cost of traveling to the trials, most likely for more than a day and taking the time off of other productive endeavors (although, I consider civil resistance as a productive endeavor, most of the time), is becoming prohibitive.

I have created a "CHIP IN" campaign if you would like to help me cover these (IL)legal expenses.

Any amount will be much appreciated! 

CLICK PICTURE OF ONE OF CINDY'S MANY ARRESTS (OCTOBER 2009) IN FRONT OF WHITE HOUSE TO DONATE




Or send a check/money order to:
Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox, LLC
PO Box 6264
Vacaville, Ca 95696

CLICK HERE TO VIEW MY UPCOMING TRAVELS AND
EVENTS IN SAN JOSE, SANTA BARBARA, PHILLY,
OHIO AND NYC

CLICK HERE FOR AN ARCHIVE OF MY PODCAST


Cindy on Long Island at Book Revue


UNITED FRONT AGAINST AUSTERITY

CINDY SHEEHAN
WILL BE ATTENDING AND SPEAKING

 

Sunday, October 7, 2012

The Revolution Continues in Venezuela!

PRESIDENT HUGO CHAVEZ AND CINDY SHEEHAN IN MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY. MARCH 2010.

Cindy Sheehan and Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox
wishes to congratulate President Hugo Chávez,
The United Socialist Party of Venezuela and the people of 
Venezuela for the great re-election victory.

I have been honored to be able to travel to Venezuela and meet with the president and people of Venezuela and to be inspired by 
the Bolivarian Revolution and the commitment by the 
people to improving their lives.

From the bottom of my heart, I wish to thank the admininstration
of Venezuela for recognizing the sovereignty of every
nation and being a beacon for peaceful and positive interactions between countries.

I wish to also congratulate President Chávez for overcoming
his battle with cancer and devoting his life to the people of 
Venezuela and the world.

(Before any say that elections in Venezuela are "rigged,"
the Jimmy Carter Center has determined that Venezuela's
elections are among the most transparent and credible internationally.


 CLICK IMAGE TO GET MORE INFO ON CINDY'S LATEST
BOOK ABOUT PRESIDENT CHAVEZ AND THE
BOLIVARIAN REVOLUTION.

UPDATE: Some Talking Gaping Pie-Hole was just on CNN and he couldn't even disguise his incredulity that there didn't appear to be one voter irregularity in the Venezuelan elections. His incredulity was because A) US elections are so flawed and corrupt, it's hard to imagine a country where that doesn't happen; B) the US spends millions of dollars in Vz trying to defeat Chavez and the Empire is shocked when the money is defeated; and C) the government and media spends a lot of time, effort, and money trying to portray Chavez as a "dictator." IN YOUR FACE, TALKING GAPING PIE-HOLE!
October 8, 2012

Will the Real Terrorist Please Stand Up (Soapbox 10/07/2012)


Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox
October 7th, 2012
 
WILL THE REAL TERRORIST PLEASE STAND UP chronicles half a century of hostile US-Cuba relations by telling the story of the Cuban five, intelligence agents sent to penetrate Cuban exile terrorist groups in Miami and now serving long prison sentences. The film highlights decades of assassinations and sabotage at first backed then ignored by the very government that launched a war against terrorism. In the film, viewers see leading terrorists, now in their 80s, recounting their deeds, and Cuban state security officials explaining why they infiltrated agents into violent Miami exile groups. The film, featuring Danny Glover and 84 year old Fidel Castro in key scenes, raises and tries to answer the question: what did Cuba do to deserve such hostile treatment? It traces key events from the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis, through multiple assassination attempts on Fidel Castro s life. This documentary reveals a story of violence that also echoed on the streets of Washington DC, New York and especially Miami where Cuban American critics of the bombers and shooters also wound up dead. 
 
Cindy interviews the filmmaker, Saul Landau, in a fascinating telling of the real story.
 
Saul also talks about the situation in Syria as he made a recent movie called,  Between Iraq and a Hard Place .
 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE SHOW
 
 
 
  

Saturday, October 6, 2012

The Debatacle: War and Thieves of the Uniparty by Diane Gee

I have a brain seizing, jaw cracking toothache right now. I prefer it to watching the debates... BUT! Jake had a chance for extra credit for his History class to watch and answer a few questions about it.

I opted to watch the Democracy Now version with Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson Tivo'd in, thinking it would be mildly less painful. Not by much, not by much.

The two main characters in the play both babbled a LOT about taxes. Trickle down business is better than trickle down government. Huh, one wants to make a profit off me, the other to spend my own money on me. In the end? One or the other, or both said this:

“When it comes to our tax code, [my opponent] and I both agree that our corporate tax rate is too high.”

“We agree; we ought to bring the tax rates down, and I do, both for corporations and for individuals.”


Sure one exuded more confidence; by confidence I mean rude interrupting motherfucker, and the other seemed a little less so.

In the end, they were both talking about the speed with which they will continue to make cuts on the things that help people, and give to the rich to create "jobs." Lemme look at my watch here, but didn't they give them a bazillion of my dollars for the last 12 years to do that, and aren't I sitting here unemployed with no health insurance to fix my tooth?

Maybe the infection is in my brain already, because tweedles dee and dum looked the same to me.

Photobucket


Education? Both support vouchers and moving our school system to the for-profit private sector. Both think loan-sharking is the price we must pay if we want a higher education. I had to laugh when one of the twins said something about 2 year trade schools. Ahh, yes, because there are so many trade jobs out there. Be a chef! Be a bookkeeper! Work for minimum wage to pay off that edumacation!

Neither of them talked about technology and research, and that we should all be allowed education if we want to survive in this world - in fact one seemed downright embarrassed to support green energy.

I hear pre-school was meme. Well, here's one for ya,

thing one and thing two
left us covered in goo
said more oil and gas are good for you


one said "More holes!"
and one said "More coal!"
well frack one and frack two!
neither one has a soul!


Now Stein and Anderson had good things to say; yet neither inspired me much.

There are so many elephants even they leave in the room. We need to nationalize energy. Period. No ifs, ands, buts or maybe's. The d-shade bragged about more drilling, the r-shade wants it in more public land.

The very biggest suck of all on our economy is our Wars, That's where all the debt comes from, that's where all the money goes, that's the Mastodon of elephants. In an economic debate, where the hell was that discussion? Stein alluded to it, Rocky dodged it some, although Rocky Anderson had a great moment when he quipped, "Certainly, our government is supposed to keep us safe, but more and more, United States citizens are worried about being safe from our government."

Word.

Stein expanded with, "Under the Obama White House, which basically codified the violations of George Bush, the attacks on our privacy rights, on First Amendment rights, the criminalization of the right to protest, the National Defense Authorization Act in which the President has claimed the right to incarcerate us, basically, without charge or trial, and to do that at his pleasure without having to justify that in any way."

I loved both of their replies, except they weren't replies at all to the question - about the role of Government - and after both of the other guys banged the National Security drum to suck up more War Machine donations, they missed the opportunity to speak against it..

I mean, what the fuck?

We spend 1.19 Trillion a year on War. I did the math, That is 3,260,273,972.60 a day on murder.

Three and a quarter BILLION a DAY. And change, if you count mere millions change.

We spend about 6 billion a year on welfare. Two days of war would pay for a years welfare.

We spend about 550 billion a year on medicare. 5 months of war equals a year of medicare.

One year of war could pay for 316 years of welfare.One year of war could pay for 3 years of of medicare.

Think about that.

You see, in the debacle called a debate, hard questions are outlawed. No one DARE breach the Pachyderm Parade dancing across our faces. Neither puppet will do anything but move right, serve their Predatory Capitalist masters, and answer vetted questions created to showcase how much they "care" about America and selling us our ass-raping with smiles.

You see, for most of our budget to be tied up in MURDER? It is totally required that our attention to be misdirected to soundbytes and bullshit.

This wasn't a debate. This was reality-tv: highly scripted kabuki theater for the masses.

No 3rd party was allowed, no one answered questions, they just stayed on talking points.

The Real War, the foundation of all wars - is Class War. The debates were part of that War on us, keeping the illusion we actually have a democracy alive - all while lying about how they are going to "help" us by aiding and abetting the Robber Class.

I can't wait until the show is over. You know, so we can quit running around with our hair on fire about what tweedle dee and tweedle dum said and get back to fighting the real problem.

Capitalism is war. Hungry children are are victims of war. People dying of simple infections are victims of war. My toothache is part of the conflict. Your job loss is collateral damage. And, while our first world problems are growing? All across the globe people are being splattered into piles of meat and gore and we are paying people to do it.

We have become killing machines enabled by the very lying bastards smirking across our screens last night.

I'm done with debates. I'm done with debating my peers about it too. I am tired of Lesser of the Two Evils, and tired of trying to explain to people that we MUST vote for 3rd party candidates to prove we are not hapless victims and we can take control. I am done, too, with fighting with those who somehow think that withholding their vote is noble - it merely leaves less of the population to manipulate.

Both Romney and Obama are thieves making war on us and the world.

My son's report was astute - and you have to love the guilelessness of children - their in class discussion was mostly kids saying "all politicians lie." He got a great grade.

Next time? He's on his own.

Thursday, October 4, 2012

A Socialist's Response to The Greatest American Scoundrel Show (Debate)

-->
A Socialist’s Response to The Greatest American Scoundrel Show (Presidential Debates)
Cindy Sheehan



For the record, I wouldn't normally even watch The Greatest American Scoundrel Show, otherwise known as the “Historic Presidential Debates,” but, like it or not, I am running for Vice President of the USA on a Socialist (Peace and Freedom) ticket. There was an “alternative debate” on Democracy, Now! last night, but, even though Candidates Rocky Anderson (Justice Party) and Jill Stein (Green Party) are left of the Blue Tie and Red Tie Scoundrels, who are given a national forum, they are still both Capitalists. I believe that either Anderson or Stein would be better than Red Tie or Blue Tie, but the Socialist solution is the perfect one, in my opinion.
Before The Show began, the onomatopoeia pundit, David Gergen (his voice sounds like he is “gerg-“ ling), said that, “Style counts in these debates.” Of course, “style counts,” because the idea that a different color tie makes a difference in substance is absurd. The average USAian is all about style and the choice is going to come down to the “lesser of two Scoundrels,” and I am not willing to settle for that.
I am not going to do a piece based on “fact checking,” because, to me, it doesn’t matter if Blue Tie or Red Tie got their facts wrong or correct, because whatever they say is fundamentally flawed to begin with. Similarly, I am not going to judge, which Stylist was victorious (but it seems that the consensus from the left-right is that the Red Tie won), because in November no matter whom you vote for and no matter which color tie is inaugurated, the 99% will lose.
So here are my responses to the few questions that the Ties were asked:
The first question, from a strangely black-eyed Lehrer, was: “What are the major differences between you two on how you would create jobs.”
Blue Tie went first and went on a long rant on how his presidency has basically been a failure at this, but of course, blaming (with some verity) the Red Tie that went before him. However, give Blue Tie another four years with failed policies and things will get better this time, he swears it on a stack of holy Federal Reserve Notes. ("I really mean it this time, Baby"). Then Red Tie talked a lot about “middle income” people. Both Ties talked a lot about the “Middle Class.” Well, the term “Middle Class” is a ruling class diversion from the fact that the USA has the widest (and growing wider) income disparity in the so-called industrial world. That’s an inconvenient fact that the Scoundrels don’t want us to know, now isn’t it?
The platform of the Peace and Freedom Party calls for 40 hours pay for a 30-hour workweek with NO mandatory overtime to approach full employment with Union wages and a Basic Guaranteed Income (BGI) for income security. Also, the Socialist solution would be to put the means of production into the hands of the workers and transform production to “need based” not “greed based." Also, end “free” trade agreements that harm workers in all countries and have little protections for workers’ rights or the environment. Both Red Tie and Blue Tie are in favor of the disastrous Trans-Pacific Pact (TPP), which would further destroy the working class, yet enrich the ownership class. True and positive change requires big and bold ideas, not reform of the old and corrupt paradigms already in place.
The next question was about “reducing the deficit” and this is also an easy one for me. Trillions of dollars have been spent on the US War OF Terror against the world since 9/11/2001 and the Military Industrial Complex is sucking the economy dry with its murderous greed. The wars should come to a speedy end and the bases that the Empire maintains around the world should be closed and our military should be reduced to the size where it can be “drowned in a bathtub.” Our platform also calls for the end to the CIA and other alphabet agencies that wreak havoc at home and abroad. And this leads to the next question. There are PLENTY of wealth and resources in this nation but the national priorities are way out of whack…a re-prioritization of programs would render the next question unnecessary.
The Ties were asked about how they feel about “Entitlements.” This is also an easy one for we Socialists to handle. What almost everyone, regardless of income status here in the USA, call “entitlements” the rest of the world calls, “human rights.”
Along with our students, our elders are being asked to shoulder an increasingly heavy burden to maximize profits for people like The Ties and their friends. Retiring with dignity at an age young enough to enjoy retirement and where needs are provided by a grateful community is a human right, not an entitlement, and one which is earned not stolen.
Healthcare is also an issue that The Ties fundamentally agree on, but one that couldn’t be more different in a Socialist planned economy. We call for a National Healthcare Plan that means “everyone in, no one out:” Quality healthcare for everyone with no opt-out for the wealthy. (In our planned economy, the disparity between the rich and the poor would evaporate and the wealth that belongs to all would be more evenly distributed, anyway). Many countries poorer than ours have successful National Healthcare systems and we demand no less. A National Healthcare system would create jobs, lower healthcare costs and would provide Medicare for all. Seniors and veterans would also be equally assured access and the VA system would no longer be needed (and this would also remove one of the problems that motivates many young people to join the service: lack of access to quality healthcare).
The penultimate question to The Ties was: “What do you see as the fundamental role of the government?” Blue Tie opened with, “keeping Americans safe.” Boo! The current real role of the US government is being subservient to all the greeds of the 1%: Wall Street, the Military Industrial Complex, Banksters, Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Energy…and Blue Tie has done a great job serving the real Masters; Red Tie would also excel.
In a Socialist system, the essential role of government is to protect Civil Rights and ensure Human Rights. Blue Tie has been the most aggressive presidential abrogator of both Civil and Human Rights, yet he said that the “genius of America is freedom and the free enterprise system.” What, freedom for the few and slavery for the many? True freedom is to be free from the government interfering with our prosperity and peace by intervening to protect the interests of the ruling class.
The final question, (thank Jeebus) was asking The Ties how they would break government ‘gridlock.” Again, from The Ties I heard a lot of “blah, blah, blah.” Blue Tie was even “gridlocked” when he had a vast majority of other Blue Ties "serving" in his first two years of office.
“Gridlock” is a problem that would not exist in a Socialist system where decisions for OUR lives, OUR workplaces, OUR economy, OUR environment, OUR security, OUR communities belong to ALL OF US, not just an oligarchy that has anointed themselves as our “lords and protectors.”
Red Tie and Blue Tie are “by and for” the one-percenters because, after all, they are one-percenters. Trust what I am about to say to you: Neither Red Tie or Blue Tie give a crap about you, your family, or your community—but you know who does? YOU!
It's about 236 years past time to take control of OUR lives into our hands—notice how I don’t say, “back into our hands?” We the People have never had control in this putative oligarchy called the USA.
However, make no mistake about it, either Blue Tie or Red Tie will ascend to the thrown of Protector of the One-Percent in November and the rest of us will lose, again. It’s a dance as old as this nation, but Election Day is only one day out of the year.
Dr. Benjamin Spock who ran for president with the Peace and Freedom Party in 1972 once said, “For us, it’s not about the next election, but the next generation.”
To the barricades of resistance, my brothers and sisters, for the next generation!



Monday, October 1, 2012

Occupy Media Interviews Cindy Sheehan


Cindy Sheehan founded Gold Star Mothers for Peace after her son, Casey, died during the Iraq War. The original Occupier, she set-up Camp Casey outside George W. Bush's ranch in 2005. Her most recent book, Revolution: A Love Story, is about the ongoing Venezualan Revolution. Originally, Cindy was a tax resistor, now she is a tax refuser. The quintessential Occupier.

Intro music: Alice DiMicele covering Buffalo Springfield's "For What It's Worth"

See Occupy Media at Facebook.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

"The War Prayer" by Mark Twain, Read by Cindy Sheehan


Transcript
It was a time of great and exalting excitement. The country was up in arms, the war was on, in every breast burned the holy fire of patriotism; the drums were beating, the bands playing, the toy pistols popping, the bunched firecrackers hissing and spluttering; on every hand and far down the receding and fading spread of roofs and balconies a fluttering wilderness of flags flashed in the sun; daily the young volunteers marched down the wide avenue gay and fine in their new uniforms, the proud fathers and mothers and sisters and sweethearts cheering them with voices choked with happy emotion as they swung by; nightly the packed mass meetings listened, panting, to patriot oratory which stirred the deepest deeps of their hearts, and which they interrupted at briefest intervals with cyclones of applause, the tears running down their cheeks the while; in the churches the pastors preached devotion to flag and country, and invoked the God of Battles beseeching His aid in our good cause in outpourings of fervid eloquence which moved every listener. It was indeed a glad and gracious time, and the half dozen rash spirits that ventured to disapprove of the war and cast a doubt upon its righteousness straightway got such a stern and angry warning that for their personal safety's sake they quickly shrank out of sight and offended no more in that way.

Sunday morning came -- next day the battalions would leave for the front; the church was filled; the volunteers were there, their young faces alight with martial dreams -- visions of the stern advance, the gathering momentum, the rushing charge, the flashing sabers, the flight of the foe, the tumult, the enveloping smoke, the fierce pursuit, the surrender! Then home from the war, bronzed heroes, welcomed, adored, submerged in golden seas of glory! With the volunteers sat their dear ones, proud, happy, and envied by the neighbors and friends who had no sons and brothers to send forth to the field of honor, there to win for the flag, or, failing, die the noblest of noble deaths. The service proceeded; a war chapter from the Old Testament was read; the first prayer was said; it was followed by an organ burst that shook the building, and with one impulse the house rose, with glowing eyes and beating hearts, and poured out that tremendous invocation

*God the all-terrible! Thou who ordainest! Thunder thy clarion and lightning thy sword!*
Then came the "long" prayer. None could remember the like of it for passionate pleading and moving and beautiful language. The burden of its supplication was, that an ever-merciful and benignant Father of us all would watch over our noble young soldiers, and aid, comfort, and encourage them in their patriotic work; bless them, shield them in the day of battle and the hour of peril, bear them in His mighty hand, make them strong and confident, invincible in the bloody onset; help them to crush the foe, grant to them and to their flag and country imperishable honor and glory --

An aged stranger entered and moved with slow and noiseless step up the main aisle, his eyes fixed upon the minister, his long body clothed in a robe that reached to his feet, his head bare, his white hair descending in a frothy cataract to his shoulders, his seamy face unnaturally pale, pale even to ghastliness. With all eyes following him and wondering, he made his silent way; without pausing, he ascended to the preacher's side and stood there waiting. With shut lids the preacher, unconscious of his presence, continued with his moving prayer, and at last finished it with the words, uttered in fervent appeal, "Bless our arms, grant us the victory, O Lord our God, Father and Protector of our land and flag!"

The stranger touched his arm, motioned him to step aside -- which the startled minister did -- and took his place. During some moments he surveyed the spellbound audience with solemn eyes, in which burned an uncanny light; then in a deep voice he said:

"I come from the Throne -- bearing a message from Almighty God!" The words smote the house with a shock; if the stranger perceived it he gave no attention. "He has heard the prayer of His servant your shepherd, and will grant it if such shall be your desire after I, His messenger, shall have explained to you its import -- that is to say, its full import. For it is like unto many of the prayers of men, in that it asks for more than he who utters it is aware of -- except he pause and think.

"God's servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two -- one uttered, the other not. Both have reached the ear of Him Who heareth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this -- keep it in mind. If you would beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! lest without intent you invoke a curse upon a neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain upon your crop which needs it, by that act you are possibly praying for a curse upon some neighbor's crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it.

"You have heard your servant's prayer -- the uttered part of it. I am commissioned of God to put into words the other part of it -- that part which the pastor -- and also you in your hearts -- fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly? God grant that it was so! You heard these words: 'Grant us the victory, O Lord our God!' That is sufficient. the *whole* of the uttered prayer is compact into those pregnant words. Elaborations were not necessary. When you have prayed for victory you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory--*must* follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the listening spirit of God fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen!

"O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle -- be Thou near them! With them -- in spirit -- we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it -- for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.

(*After a pause.*) "Ye have prayed it; if ye still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High waits!"

It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said.

End

Twain apparently dictated it around 1904-05; it was rejected by his publisher, and was found after his death among his unpublished manuscripts. It was first published in 1923 in Albert Bigelow Paine's anthology, Europe and Elsewhere.

The story is in response to a particular war, namely the Philippine-American War of 1899-1902, which Twain opposed.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

"Capitalism is like an old FRIDGE" (SOAPBOX SEPTEMBER 30, 2012)

CAPITALISM IS LIKE AN OLD REFRIDGERATOR
SEPT. 30, 2012
SOAPBOX
GUEST: PROFESSOR RICHARD WOLFF


This week, Cindy Sheehan, interviews Marxist economics professor, Richard D. Wolff.

Professor Wolff breaks a complicated subject down with easily understood analogies and with prophetic solutions.

Listen at 2pm (PDST) at 
Sunday, September 30th

Anytime by clicking here

Or Subscribing to the Podcasts on iTunes!



RENT SALE!


Just this past week, I have been contacted by three people who recently read my new book, 
Revolution, A Love Story: A Better World is Possible
and all used the same word: DEVOURED.
To help pay rent and bills this month, I am offering an 
autographed copy of the 
book for $10 (including shipping and handling).
You will be helping Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox
pay the bills to stay on the air AND you will be 
getting a book to DEVOUR.

CLICK THE PAYMENT BUTTONS, OR SEND A CHECK/MONEY ORDER TO

CINDY SHEEHAN'S SOAPBOX, LLC
PO BOX 6264
VACAVILLE, CA 95696

(PLEASE ALLOW ABOUT 4 WEEKS FOR DELIVERY AND DUE TO THE SPECIAL PRICE, THIS OFFER IS NOT GOOD OUTSIDE THE USA).

OTHER WAYS TO ORDER 
REVOLUTION, A LOVE STORY
CLICK HERE 





QUANTITY




 

POPULAR POSTS