Tuesday, March 15, 2016

RAY O' LIGHT NEWSLETTER #95 (March-April 2016)






RAY O’ LIGHT NEWSLETTER                            
March-April  2016    Number 95
 
Publication of the Revolutionary Organization of Labor, USA

 
2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Campaigns Update—

From Obama’s State of the Union Address and Governor Haley’s Response,
to the Anti-Trump Declarations of McCain, Romney and Ryan –

 
WALL STREET EXERCISES ITS “REPUBLICRAT” POLITICAL MUSCLE

by RAY LIGHT

Two months ago, even before the Iowa Caucuses and the New Hampshire Primary formally ushered in the Primary season, we had already observed: “Under the banner of ‘universal suffrage,’ the TV debates, polls, rallies, and constant media coverage have revealed that there is remarkably little support for the ‘Republicrat’ ‘2016 heavy favorites’ (mainstream Democratic and Republican candidates, Hillary Clinton and especially Jeb Bush). Instead, the strong showing of right wing, fascistic Tea Party candidates such as Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Cruz, Rubio et al. on the Republican side and the social-democrat Sanders on the Democratic side reflects some level of popular mass rejection of ‘Republicrat Rule’ and the Wall Street imperialist ruling class they represent.” (“A Revolutionary Approach to the Sanders Presidential Campaign,” Ray O’ Light Newsletter #94)

Since that time, the Wall Street rulers and their “Republicrat” political flunkeys have made many deceptive moves on the U.S. population; yet they still have been unable to overcome significant “popular mass rejection” of the “Republicrats” as reflected in the number of primary contests and caucuses in which Wall Street’s favorite candidates have failed to win.

In the Democratic contests, the social democrat Sanders has defeated Wall Street’s candidate, Hillary Clinton, in more than a third of the states thus far. This has occurred despite Clinton’s having almost all the Democratic Party politicians and officials’ support, despite the widespread confusion promoted in the monopoly capitalist-controlled mass media of the many rich and well-connected Super Delegate commitments to Clinton with the actual delegate votes won by Clinton and Sanders in
the primaries thus making it appear that Clinton has an overwhelming lead over Sanders, and despite the  fraudulent support for Clinton and attack on Sanders by Congressman John Lewis and the Congressional Black Caucus Political Action Committee, especially in South Carolina’s important early primary. (See the February 14, 2016 Statement of the Revolutionary Organization of Labor USA entitled, “Wall Street Seeks Bailout by South Carolina Afro-Americans!” elsewhere in this issue.)

 The Repudiation of Wall Street’s “Republicrat” candidates in the Republican Party has been even more stunning. Billionaire businessman Donald Trump, who has never held a government office, has won most of the Republican contests with his Hitlerian irrational public performances, full of white and great nation chauvinist promises of a return of the U.S. Empire to its former power and glory. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas won his home state primary and has been the only real challenger to Trump, with his “Trump light” vitriolic, anti-Establishment rhetoric. Jeb Bush, the heavy Republican favorite coming into the election season, like Clinton on the Democratic side, flush with the campaign cash from Wall Street and Corporate America, has already had to bow out of the race! The only moderate Republican left in the race is Ohio’s John Kasich who has not come close to winning anywhere and badly trails the other three candidates. The other remaining Republican candidate, Florida Senator Marco Rubio has no significant track record or experience and his individual personal ambition is clearly his main attribute. He has now altered his Tea Party, anti-Establishment posturing that got him elected to the Senate so that he could become the “Republicrat” challenger to Trump, backed by Wall Street. However, as Rubio has moved away from his Tea Party origins, his campaign has fallen flat with the angry Republican primary voters and he, like Kasich, is bottoming out.

***

In the pages of our Newsletter, especially during the Obama years, we have repeatedly exposed the fact that the leading Republican and Democratic Party politicians, function cooperatively as “Republicrats.” They provide the political representation for the U.S. finance capitalists of Wall Street, the one-tenth of one percent who constitute the U.S. ruling class. There are no basic differences between the mainstream Republicans and Democrats. These days, the real differences involving the two U.S. monopoly capitalist and imperialist political parties occur between the Tea Party forces in the Republican Party on the one hand and the mainstream Republicans and Democrats on the other.*

*Certainly, the “political suicide” committed at the behest of the Wall Street ruling class by former Republican Speaker John Boehner, stepping down as speaker and resigning his House seat, too, as the price for getting enough Tea Party Congresspeople to vote for passage of the Federal Government’s budget at the end of last year, represented just how serious is the schism between the mainstream Republicans and the Tea Party Republicans.

It is this important fact that explains the strangely harmonious relationship between Democratic President Obama’s State of the Union address on January 12th and South Carolina Governor Haley’s official Republican response that same evening. It also explains the seemingly damaging extreme anti-Republican Party statements issued by Mitt Romney and John McCain, the Republican Presidential candidates in the 2012 and 2008 elections respectively, with their vehement denunciations of Donald Trump, the clear front-runner in the primary campaign to be the 2016 Republican candidate for President!

Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address: What was it all about?

On January 12, 2016 President Barack Obama presented his eighth and final “report on the State of the Union.” As he admitted up front, “tonight I want to go easy on the traditional list of proposals for the year ahead.” “I want to focus on the next five years, the next 10 years, and beyond. I want to focus on our future.” With that line, Obama gave himself and Congress a “free pass”  to do nothing, to fight for nothing in the interests of the 99% of us, during his final year in the White House.

What then was President Obama trying to prepare us to do this time? A glimpse could be seen in the jokes that made up the first paragraph of his speech. They were all directed at the Presidential candidates in the room “antsy to get back to Iowa.” So, it was about the 2016 Presidential election campaign.

And, in the second paragraph, Democrat Obama praised Republican Speaker of the House Ryan, who had run as Mitt Romney’s running mate against Obama-Biden in the last presidential election, for the “constructive approach taken at the end of last year to pass a budget …” Later in the speech, Obama observed that, “Speaker Ryan has talked about his interest in tackling poverty … I’d welcome a serious discussion about strategies we can all support …”  No Republican other than Ryan was mentioned by name in Obama’s State of the Union Address and Ryan was presented in a positive light! So Obama’s speech was, in effect, a bipartisan Democratic-Republican (or “Republicrat”) stand on the 2016 U.S. Presidential election campaign, masquerading as a State of the Union Address!

Obama’s main message is: “Our public life withers when only the most extreme voices get all the attention. And most of all, democracy breaks down when the average person feels their voice doesn’t matter; that the system is rigged in favor of the rich or the powerful or some special interest.” Sanders is the main candidate in either party focusing on the fact that “the system is rigged in favor of the rich.” And, according to Obama, Sanders can be lumped with Trump and the Tea Party as an extremist contributing to “the withering of our public life.”

He states:  “… as frustration grows, there will be voices urging us to fall back into our respective tribes, to scapegoat fellow citizens who don’t look like us or pray like us, or vote like we do, or share the same background. We can’t afford to go down that path.” Obama is here not just talking about Trump and Cruz and the Tea Party forces. He is also attacking the Sanders campaign for its focused attack on Wall Street, for its open “Class Warfare.”

Many of our readers are still enthralled by the high drama of the “never-ending battle,” the shadow boxing, between the Democrats and the Republicans that they think “proves” that we in the USA have “democratic choices.” Please consider that the “official Republican response to President Obama’s final State of the Union address” delivered by South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley immediately following Obama’s address was not the stern rebuttal we have come to expect from the opposition party but was more of an echo of Obama’s main points!

-Obama’s State of the Union Address and Haley’s Echo-

Just as Obama had kind words for House Speaker Ryan, the one Republican leader he mentioned, Governor Haley had kind words for the one Democratic leader she mentioned, President Obama! Besides acknowledging that seven years earlier, Obama’s election as president “broke historic barriers and inspired millions of Americans,” she added, “As he did when he first ran for office, tonight, President Obama spoke eloquently about grand things.” Governor Haley, too, was presenting a bipartisan “Republicrat” front on behalf of Wall Street.

In the name of speaking “on our future,” Obama had given himself and the Republican-led House and Senate a pass on doing any good for the 99% over his last year in office. Governor Haley gave Obama’s State of the Union Address a pass! She said, “Soon the Obama presidency will end, and America will have a chance to turn in a new direction. That direction is what I want to talk about tonight.”

Both Haley and Obama gently raised gay rights. Obama claimed that “we secured the freedom in every state to marry the person we love.” Haley was more restrained but stated that, if Republicans gain the presidency, “we would respect differences in modern families,” while also insisting on “respect for religious liberty…” Remarkably, on one of the most divisive issues between the two parties over the Bush and Obama years, Haley and Obama used the same words to say that we have to “fix our broken immigration system.”

Obama mentioned “protecting kids from gun violence.” Haley spoke at length about the violent murder of nine Black bible study participants by the young white man they had invited to pray with them at the historic Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston, South Carolina. Governor Haley praised the passive reaction of many Black people in Charleston to the tragedy. “We didn’t have violence, we had vigils. We didn’t have riots, we had hugs. We didn’t turn against each other’s race or religion, we turned toward God…” The Revolutionary Organization of Labor, USA has described this as a reflexive return to a slave culture reaction under stark terror, where grief-stricken family members of some victims forgave the unrepentant murderous white supremacist who had shown no remorse for his cold-blooded murder of nine peaceful Black citizens and indeed had not asked for forgiveness. Haley was praising the slave mentality response that Obama had come to Charleston to promote among the victims’ families and community in mourning!

In a speech supposedly in rebuttal to Obama and the Democrats, Governor Haley states: “We need to be honest with each other and with ourselves. While Democrats in Washington bear much responsibility for the problems facing America today, they do not bear it alone. There is more than enough blame to go around. We as Republicans need to own that truth. We need to recognize our contributions to the erosion of the public trust in America’s leadership. We need to accept the fact that we’ve played a role in how and why our government is broken. And then we need to fix it.” (My emphasis, ROL)

Obama cleverly raises his “honest moment” too. “Some areas where we just have to be honest — it has been difficult to find agreement over the last seven years. And a lot … fall under the category of what role the government should play in making sure the system’s not rigged in favor of the wealthiest and biggest corporations. And it’s an honest disagreement, and the American people have a choice to make.” (My emphasis, ROL) On the surface, Obama sounds like Bernie Sanders here. A closer reading reveals the opposite: Sanders tells the people that the system is rigged in favor of Wall Street, that this is the source of the gross inequality in the USA today and that a “political revolution” is needed to change the system. Obama says there is an “honest disagreement” [between Republicans and Democrats?] about this fact!

Haley warns: “During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices. We must resist that temptation.” After describing the situation in South Carolina following the mass murder at Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston (e.g.,“We didn’t have violence we had vigils.”), Haley draws what she calls “an important lesson.” She states: “In many parts of society today, whether in popular culture, academia, the media, or politics, there’s a tendency to falsely equate noise with results. Some people think you have to be the loudest voice in the room to make a difference. That’s just not true. Often, the best thing we can do is turn down the volume.” Haley directs her opposition here to Trump and the Tea Party forces as well as the Sanders Campaign.

The main reasons for the harmonious, unified Republicrat voice with which Obama and Haley spoke on behalf of the Wall Street ruling class were:  1) to block Donald Trump and the Tea Party forces in the Republican Party from seizing the Republican presidential nomination away from Jeb Bush or some other Republicrat Republican; and 2) to try to equate Sanders with the irrational and fascistic Trump, to smear Bernie Sanders with the same “extremist” label, in his competition with Republicrat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination for President. This is what the Wall Street ruling class wanted and this is what Obama and Haley gave them.

***

The Obama-Haley team’s State of the Union night’s message was immediately adopted by the Wall Street-controlled mass media outlets on radio, TV, in Newspapers, and Magazines. Along with the attacks on Sanders and Trump, there was renewed support for Clinton and Bush. But the primary and caucus results that have followed make it clear that the voters are angry enough that they have maintained, at least for now, their antipathy for if not outright rejection of Republicrat Rule and of the Wall Street rich that the Republicrat politicians represent.

-Haley’s Endorsement of Marco Rubio — a failed initiative-

On February 17th, three days before the South Carolina Republican Primary, the state’s Governor, who had been strategically placed to give the Republican Party’s response to the President’s State of the Union Address the previous month gave her coveted endorsement to Senator Marco Rubio. Considered two of the very few young rising stars of the Republican Party, both are forty-four years old and both are the children of immigrants. Haley had opted to give Rubio her endorsement despite the personal entreaties of senior Republican senator Lindsay Graham and Jeb Bush himself, both seeking her endorsement of Bush.

But even with Haley’s endorsement, Rubio’s make-over as Wall Street’s “new Republicrat hope” against Trump failed to move South Carolina’s voters. And Rubio finally garnered his very first state primary victory on Super Tuesday.

-Romney, McCain and Ryan—Oh My!-


With the Trump Campaign still rolling along toward the Republican Presidential nomination following Super Tuesday, Wall Street panic at the prospect of at least one of the two major party candidates not being owned and controlled by U.S. finance capital led the ruling class to resort to some desperate new measures.

First of all, Mitt Romney was hauled out to denounce Donald Trump. Romney is none other than the Republican Party’s previous presidential candidate (in 2012), the very position that Trump is seeking in 2016! As one of the senior leaders of the Republican Party, Romney exposed Trump in no uncertain terms as a liar and a con man. Said Romney, “Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University.” “Dishonesty is Donald Trump’s hallmark.” “Think of Donald Trump’s personal qualities. The bullying, the greed, the showing off, the misogyny, the absurd third-grade theatrics.” This level of attack on the front-runner of one’s political party is unprecedented in my memory. But there is more.

John McCain, the 2008 Republican candidate, backed up Romney’s concerns about Trump the very same day, indicating, as some pundits observed, that Romney and McCain coordinated their anti-Trump statements ahead of time. McCain added: “I would also echo the many concerns about Mr. Trump’s uninformed and indeed dangerous statements on national security issues that have been raised by 65 Republican defense and foreign policy leaders.”

Finally, Paul Ryan, the current Speaker of the House, who was Romney’s Republican running mate in the 2012 election, had just before Super Tuesday, criticized Trump for his failure to immediately reject the endorsement by long-time white supremacist and Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. Trump responded by threatening retaliation against Speaker Ryan. On the same day as Romney issued his statement, Ryan made clear his support for Romney in his effort to get voters to run away from Trump. Ryan said, “Mitt Romney is one of our party leaders, and he cares deeply about the future of the Republican party and the country.” And Ryan added: “Mitt and I are very close friends.” (Remember that Ryan was also the one Republican mentioned by fellow Republicrat President Obama in his State of the Union Address and mentioned favorably at that.)

Beyond this flexing of Republican Party Establishment authority by McCain, Romney and Ryan, Romney took things a step further. He outlined a strategy that might have a chance to be successful in derailing the Trump express train to the nomination. Romney stated: “Given the current delegate selection process, this means that I would vote for Marco Rubio in Florida, for John Kasich in Ohio and for Ted Cruz or whichever one of the other two contenders has the best chance of beating Mr. Trump in a given state.” Encouraging all three of the remaining candidates to remain in the race for the Republican nomination, Romney and now many others thereby hope to deprive Trump of sufficient delegates through the primary season so that the nominee will be crowned at a contested convention.

Two AP reporters said, “Romney confidant Ron Kaufman, a senior member of the Republican National Committee, openly embraced the possibility of a contested convention: ‘If that’s the only way to stop Trump, it makes sense,’ he told The Associated Press.” (“Romney, McCain: Trump a danger for American’s future,” by S. Peoples and B. McCombs)

CONCLUSION:

1. The unprecedented harmony between Democratic President Obama’s State of the Union Address and South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley’s official Republican response reflects the fact that the “fights” between the mainstream Democrats and mainstream Republicans are nothing but shadow boxing by the two branches of the imperialist war party, the Republicrats. Looking back to the 2012 Presidential race, it is clear that the selection of Mitt Romney as the Republican candidate running against the incumbent President was not an accident. The fact is that Romney was the only Republican candidate who could not afford to condemn Obama for the Affordable Care Act, the Republican’s number one grievance against Obama, since that act was essentially Massachusetts “Romneycare” before it became federal “Obamacare.” Wall Street certainly was not serious about defeating Obama who in his first term had provided U.S. finance capital with everything they could possibly hope for, including a massive bailout of those “too big to fail” and no jail time for their criminal acts in creating the economic crisis of 2008.

Looking back to the 2000 Presidential Election: Sitting Vice President Democrat Al Gore presided in the Joint Session of Congress over the official tabulation of the electoral college vote that handed Republican George W. Bush the presidency over Gore himself — despite the fact that Gore had garnered at least a half million more votes than Bush. Moreover, the Florida vote had been swamped by controversies of all kinds, including hanging chad ballots and strange polling results as well as wholesale deprivation of the right to vote for targeted sectors of the population, including Afro-Americans. The result had been that the Supreme Court voted five to four giving Bush the election. But Gore’s active role in suppressing the Congressional Black Caucus’ protest of the Florida electoral vote exposed the fact that some things were more important to Gore than winning the Presidency! Wall Street wanted stability returned to the Executive Branch of the U.S. government which had been in paralysis for weeks. So Gore dutifully fought in the Joint Session of Congress to have himself declared the loser and George W. Bush, the winner. Talk about Republicrat cooperation!

2. The unprecedented acrimony displayed by the three most authoritative Republican establishment figures (Romney, McCain and Ryan) toward the current Republican Party front-runner for the Presidential nomination, Donald Trump, is a reflection of the fact that there are much more important considerations for the Republican wing of the Republicrats than their political party. They are, first and foremost, servants of the U.S. ruling class, Wall Street finance capital. And their job is to make sure that an out of control Tea Party fascist like Donald Trump does not disrupt the monopoly capitalist paradise for Wall Street (and hell for most of the rest of us.) The core of the U.S. ruling class does not yet need to resort to the open fascist rule of a Hitler/Trump though it is no doubt studying the impact that Trump’s demagogy is having on the angry and frustrated U.S. populace for a time when open fascism is needed. Meanwhile, the mounting fascist measures of the Republicrats have been fueled by six decades of U.S. imperialist hegemony and the growth and now decline of the U.S. Empire. Certainly, when China Inc. or Japan Inc. comes to collect the trillion dollars owed to each of them by the USA, the fascist mobilization of the U.S. population may allow the U.S. ruling class to wage war instead of paying its debts.

3. The threat of the Bernie Sanders campaign to the U.S. ruling class is much more direct and immediate. For this campaign is mobilizing among the workers and the 99% on the basis of our real needs at least domestically.* On this basis, the Revolutionary Organization of Labor, USA is taking a position of critical support for the Sanders Campaign among the people. This Campaign includes practical education through struggle among the workers and oppressed masses that we are entitled to a decent life and that Wall Street is standing in our way.

*Internationally, Sanders, like all the other Republicrat and Tea Party candidates, sides with the U.S. Empire against the international working class and the oppressed peoples, attempting to deprive us of the strength of our international solidarity in the struggle against U.S.-led international capitalism.

If the proletarian revolutionaries are successful in breaking this mobilizing force away from the Democratic wing of the Republicrats, then a political revolution way beyond Sanders’ conception could lead to substantial increase in the power of the workers and oppressed peoples on the road to proletarian power. The cost of universal single payer health care to Wall Street, and specifically the destruction of the private insurance industry, would itself be an immense gain. The loss of student loan income to the legal loan sharks due to free public college, the loss of corporate superprofits due to substantial wage increases, and some greater accountability of the police, curbing their criminal conduct toward Afro-Americans, immigrants and other vulnerable sectors of the population, giving these sectors greater access to a decent life, any or all of these things will be achieved only at the expense of Wall Street.

Thus, the Republicrat condemnation of the fascistic Trump, in particular, has the added benefit for Wall Street of tarnishing Sanders with the same “extremist” brush enhancing the chances that Republicrat Hillary Clinton will prevail as the Democratic Party nominee.

***

The political challenge for the few revolutionary forces in the USA is to participate inside and outside the Sanders Campaign in the mass movement demanding concrete concessions from the Wall Street ruling class and its U.S. Empire state apparatus, and mobilizing mass opposition to the fascistic Tea Party motion. We must continue to concentrate the main struggle against the Republicrats and their Wall Street ruling class masters who are so brutally wielding the actual power today.




Stop Obama’s Mass Deportations of Women and Children!
by ROSE BROWN



Two days before Christmas, 2015, the Washington Post reported that the Obama Administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had begun preparing for the detention and deportation of hundreds of children and families who had fled across the U.S. border fleeing from violence in Central America (especially Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala). Reportedly over 100,000 families with both children and adults had taken this harrowing journey since the beginning of 2014 with the hope of finding sanctuary in the USA. This was in addition to an unprecedented 68,000 unaccompanied Central American minors who crossed the border in the summer of 2014 under the cruel illusion that the Obama Administration was welcoming immigrant youth.

Right after New Year’s Day 2016, the raids by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) began!! “Deporter-in-chief” President Obama whose administration has deported over two million undocumented immigrants, more than any other administration in U.S. history, has now reached a new low – focusing deportation efforts on women and children who are seeking refuge and asylum! These raids proceeded in spite of protests from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.  Democratic Representative Luis Gutierrez of Illinois led a rally outside the White House urging Obama to grant temporary protected status to immigrants who had already been ordered to be deported.

The raids have spread fear and division in Latino immigrant communities. Democratic Representative Linda Sanchez, chairwoman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, reported that “Parents are keeping kids home from school; many are not going to work or are afraid to even leave the house to buy groceries. They’re literally tearing apart families.”(“Deportations revive rift between Obama and fellow Democrats,” LA Times, 1/9/16)

Just to make it clear that these arrests and deportations would not stop, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson issued a statement saying, “This should come as no surprise. I have said publicly for months that individuals, who constitute enforcement priorities, including families and unaccompanied children, will be removed.” (Ibid.)

The U.S. multi-national working class needs unity against our monopoly capitalist Wall Street imperialist oppressors! We need to build a mass movement to stop deportations! This movement needs to be directed against Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump who has made the call for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants a centerpiece of his fascistic Presidential campaign. It even more urgently needs to be directed against the incumbent Democratic Obama Administration which is carrying out these fascistic raids right now!

*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *

Where Has the U.S. Anti-War Movement Gone?

by ROSE BROWN


March 20, 2016 marks the 13th anniversary of the U.S. imperialist-led invasion of Iraq. Democratic President Barack Obama, who campaigned for President saying that he voted against going to war in Iraq and that if elected he would withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq (to send them to Afghanistan instead – a campaign pledge the anti-war movement chose to ignore) has now deployed U.S. troops back into Iraq, as well as into Afghanistan, Syria, Honduras, the Philippines (with his “pivot to Asia”), and elsewhere. It’s almost fifteen years since U.S. imperialist chieftain George W. Bush declared war on the world and launched the imperialist invasion of Afghanistan.

Veterans for Peace, Smedley Butler Brigade, in Massachusetts distribute the following information:

“The Cost of War in Iraq & Afghanistan

•    More than 5,000 US military have been killed.
•    It is estimated that more than 150,000 US troops have been seriously injured & more than 300,000 suffer PTSD.
•    More than 1,800,000 Iraqi & Afghan civilians have been killed or seriously wounded.
•    4.7 million Iraqis have fled their homes; millions more are psychologically traumatized.
•    The US has spent more than $860 billion.” 

Thirteen years ago, millions of people around the world, including 500,000 in New York City alone were on the streets protesting the U.S. government’s plan to lead an invasion of Iraq.

Unfortunately, once the U.S. government had “troops on the ground” in Iraq, the anti-war section of the U.S. labor movement and most of the anti-war masses, in the name of “rallying behind the troops,” stopped their protests! In addition, as anti-war heroine Cindy Sheehan has repeatedly pointed out, once Democrat Barack Obama was elected President, the anti-war movement with its many unhealthy ties to the Democratic Party, proved to be merely an anti “Republican war” movement. We distributed “An Open Letter to February 15th Protesters Around the World” at the massive demonstration in New York City and elsewhere on February 15, 2003. This Ray O. Light statement entitled “The Enemy is not ‘War’ but Imperialism!!” pointed out that imperialism is the principal source of war in our era and that Social-Democrats around the world had rallied to oppose “war” but not the imperialist system which breeds war!

Where are the anti-war protests in the USA today? In early March, 2016, CODE PINK and United for Peace and Justice (UPJ), among others, sponsored a meeting in Washington, DC focusing on the terrible crimes of Saudi Arabia. The International Action Center, the Workers World Party and the ANSWER Coalition and the Party for Socialism and Liberation, among others, have called for a mass mobilization to Washington, DC for a “National March to Support Palestine” on March 20 timed to coincide with the opening of the AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) focused on opposition to the Israeli state. Objectively, these opportunist forces are letting U.S. imperialism off the hook. Bestial U.S. imperialism massively supports both the Saudi Arabian government and the state of Israel and has more troops deployed overseas and more military bases around the world and more weapons of mass destruction than any other government in the world!?! What about our proletarian internationalist responsibility to focus on “our own” U.S. imperialist government?!

In addition, there is U.S. Labor Against the War (USLAW) which from its birth in 2003 worked to water down and undermine the outstanding labor anti-war work begun by New York City Labor Against the War (NYCLAW) against the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. USLAW has called for a “National Labor Assembly” April 15-17 in Silver Spring, Maryland around the theme “Reimagining National Security for a Safer Planet.” What does that mean? An anti-war activist commented that it sounds like the CIA has chosen the USLAW Assembly theme. It seems that “national security” for the core state apparatus of the U.S. Empire is what USLAW is concerned about!

The great revolutionary leader Vladimir Lenin wrote a pamphlet entitled “Socialism and War” in 1915 before the Great October Revolution in Russia and while World War I was raging. He pointed out that “Socialists have always condemned wars between peoples as barbarous and bestial,” that “whoever justifies participation in this war [World War I] perpetuates imperialist oppression of nations. [But] whoever seeks to use the present difficulties of the governments in order to fight for a social revolution is fighting for the real freedom of all nations, a freedom that can be realized only under socialism.” He projected the slogan: “Turn the Imperialist War into a Civil War.”

The only way to stop U.S. imperialist-led war today is to focus on our main enemy, imperialism, headed by U.S. imperialism and for the workers and oppressed of the world to fight for power – to take the power away from the imperialists of the world and, in the first place, U.S. imperialism.


*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *

WALL STREET SEEKS BAILOUT BY SOUTH CAROLINA AFRO-AMERICANS!

Statement* by Revolutionary Organization of Labor, USA – February 14, 2016
*Slightly modified

The Bush II and Obama Administrations each in turn gave Wall Street an almost one trillion dollar bailout within the first year after these same Wall Street criminals created the 2008 economic crisis. As Senator Bernie Sanders has pointed out, Wall Street has paid $200 billion in fines yet not one of these criminals has gone to jail. In fact, we can calculate that the bailout gifts from these two “Republicrat” administrations (from our tax money) left Wall Street at least one and one-half trillion dollars ahead! Meanwhile, the crisis still plagues most of the rest of the 99% of us in the USA till this very day, almost eight years later.

The “generosity” of the rest of us toward the super rich  U.S. ruling class evidently does have some limits though: In the 2016 presidential election season thus far the candidates of the mainstream Republican and Democratic parties, the “Republicrat” candidates of Wall Street such as Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton, have been unable to mount effective campaigns — even with their campaign coffers flush with largely untraceable corporate cash thanks to the Citizens United decision of the U.S.      Supreme Court.

While the fascistic Tea Party candidates — Trump, Cruz, Carson and Rubio — are attracting the Republican primary voters, they are even scarier than the Republicrats. It is in the Democratic Party primaries that the Sanders campaign provides some limited ability of the U.S. working class and masses to express our political needs and aspirations. It is in this campaign that thousands of us are gathering around the elementary truth that Wall Street has much too much and Main Street is entitled to much more than we have. It is here that we are taking the first political baby steps toward seizing political power from Wall Street finance capital backed by “Republicrat” political rule and the U.S. military/police forces at home and around the world.

Tragically, Sanders, like all the other “Republicrat” and Tea Party candidates, is a defender of the U.S. Empire. Thus, on foreign policy issues, as usual, the Democratic/Republican political duopoly in the 2016 Campaign effectively suppresses the ability of the U.S. population to express solidarity with the rest of the international working class and the oppressed peoples against the unceasing U.S.imperialist-led War of Terror from North Africa and the Middle East to Asia and Latin America. This is why Sanders could say from the outset that he will support the Democratic Party candidate and that he “likes” the brutal war criminal Hillary Clinton with her hands stained with the blood of the peoples from Honduras to Syria and Libya.

Nonetheless, the Bernie Sanders campaign is mobilizing among the 99% of us to make economic, political and social demands on the U.S. monopoly capitalist ruling class. And the campaign is gathering momentum far beyond anything even Sanders had imagined. After a virtual tie in Iowa, Sanders decisively defeated Clinton 60% to 40% in New Hampshire, even winning among woman voters.

In fact, the Clinton campaign, with the hopes and prayers as well as the financial blessings of the Wall Street ruling class, is counting upon the Black masses of South Carolina to deliver Clinton and Wall Street from the serious and simple demands for single payer health care (that would wipe out the health insurance industry), free public college tuition (that would stop the loan sharks feeding on struggling students), $15/hour minimum wage (almost a living wage). Yet, there is almost no other sector of the U.S. population that would benefit more than South Carolina’s Afro-American population from taking from the Wall Street rich and funding these programs for the rest of us!

–Why the Wall Street Rich Believe the Afro-American people of South Carolina
Will be Their Deliverance–

Eight years ago, Obama won his first primary victory in South Carolina. We reported then, “In South Carolina, in a record turnout, more than half of the votes in the Democratic Primary were Afro-American. Eighty percent of the Afro-American voters supported Obama. It was on the basis of this Black solidarity or Black electoral power that Obama won an overwhelming victory in the South Carolina primary – 55% to Hillary Clinton’s 27% and Edwards’ 15%. Yet Obama did nothing to encourage the hard-pressed Afro-American people of South Carolina.

“Exultant in this decisive victory, Obama and his campaigners chanted, ‘Race doesn’t matter!’ in the face of the obvious fact that ‘race’ had mattered there ... instead of expressing appreciation to the Black masses for the victory and dedicating himself to representing their interests, Obama and his ‘campaigners’ insulted the Black masses, deprecating their effort. As if ashamed of their support, Obama distanced himself from the very people who had provided his victory.” (“The 2008 Presidential Election, the Barack Obama Campaign, and the Need for Afro-American National Liberation,”Ray O’ Light Newsletter #47, February-March 2008)

Through the eight years since, the Afro-American people of South Carolina have continued to show remarkable loyalty to Obama, in spite of the fact that his seven years in the U.S. Presidency have seen their fortunes grow ever more desperate economically and politically and socially. From the execution of Troy Davis to the immediate and unjust firing of Shirley Sherrod, the first Afro-American head of the Georgia Department of Agriculture, to the Obama-led War on Libya and the African Continent and his elimination of the Department of Homeland Security monitors of White Supremacist terrorist groups which paved the way for Dylann Roof to massacre the bible study group at Charleston’s most historic Afro-American church, Emanuel AME Church, just days after a white North Charleston cop fatally shot a Black man eight times in the back. Obama and U.S. imperialism praised those among the bereaved church families who had reverted to a slave culture. They forgave the cold-blooded Roof who had not shown any remorse or asked to be forgiven.

***

Now, days before the 2016 South Carolina presidential primary, a huge fraud is being perpetrated upon the Black masses of South Carolina. On February 11th, the Congressional Black Caucus Political Action Committee, announced its endorsement of Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders. There had been no vote by the Congressional Black Caucus itself! There are 46 members of the Congressional Black Caucus. The CBC PAC voters had included eleven lobbyists, 2 PAC officials and seven elected officials. These are the people responsible for bringing the money into the CBC. And they dutifully followed the money. And the money is with Clinton. And most of the CBC members kept their mouths shut.

To try to seal the deal, Congressman John Lewis, a true icon of the 1960’s civil right movement, grabbed center stage at the CBC PAC Press Conference and disgraced himself with a fraudulent statement no doubt addressed directly to the Black masses of South Carolina.

Congressman Lewis, at other times a modest person, trashed Bernie Sanders’ role in the civil rights movement. Lewis who, with other civil rights heroes, functioned in the Black Belt South in the early 1960’s, dismissed Sanders by stating that he had never met Sanders in that period. Lewis immediately added that he had met Hillary and President Clinton. Hillary Clinton had actually been an active supporter of Senator Barry Goldwater’s Republican Presidential run in 1964. And Goldwater had voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964! In fact, Hillary Clinton had remained a Young Republican until 1968. Sanders had been an active member and leader in Chicago of CORE, a major civil rights organization.

The only member of the Congressional Black Caucus who has endorsed Sanders, and the only Muslim in Congress, Keith Ellison, exposed the absurdity of Lewis’ “testimony” about not knowing Sanders in a period when there were thousands in the movement all over the country and when Sanders and Lewis were working in different parts of the country. Others have come forward with documentation including photos of Sanders in action back then. This was very positive. In addition, Ben Jealous, the former head of the national NAACP has also endorsed Sanders. If the word from Congressman Ellison and President Jealous gets to the Afro-American voters in South Carolina, they will have the opportunity to think for themselves about who to vote for and against.

A final thought: Hillary Clinton has been wrapping herself around Obama and is now touting the fact that Barack Obama got more money from Wall Street than anyone else in the 2008 Campaign. She then tries to say Obama wasn’t bought and she praises Obama’s alleged “fight” against Wall Street, challenging Sanders to spill the beans about Obama and lose the vote in South Carolina. Because Sanders is tied to the Democratic Party and the U.S. Empire, it is unlikely he will tell the people the truth about Obama and Wall Street. Nevertheless, Sanders has stated that the people of this country understand that if the sharks on Wall Street are “investing” in political candidates they expect to get a big pay-off. So, on this fundamental question of Big Money in politics, the Sanders Campaign is helping to educate the people. It is all to the good.

Meanwhile, the fact that Ben Jealous, Keith Ellison and other Black leaders are supporting Sanders against the Wall Street candidate and against the tired old leadership of a corrupt Congressional Black Caucus is the beginning of a new way forward for an Afro-American liberation movement that has been unwilling to participate in constructive and principled criticism for decades since the martyrdom of Martin Luther King, Jr. placed him and black leadership “above criticism.”

… when the Afro-American masses of South Carolina grasp this truth, they will  reject [every] Wall Street bailout. 

No to Wall Street Bailout in South Carolina!

Toward Victorious
   Afro-American National Liberation!

—Ray Light


*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *
















“If You’re Not Outraged, You’re Not Paying Attention”*
Get Angry, Get Active, Rise Up – Fight for Workers Power!


*A good bumper sticker reads, “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.” If you are paying attention, please send me the items that are enraging you. Thanks to comrades Carl Pappos, Lea Charles and Rose Brown for submitting the items in this issue..
- the Editor


102,000 people, 9000 of them children, have been poisoned by the public water system in Flint, Michigan, a majority Black city. The children have been permanently compromised as lead poisoning in children immediately affects brain development and is irreversible. In addition, at least 10 people have died from Legionnaires Disease with a tenfold increase in cases.  In the five years before the consumption of the Flint River water there were no deaths from Legionnaires Disease.  This abominable attack on the people of Flint was not a simple mistake but a conscious, greedy barbarian effort to increase the profits of the rich. 

In 2014 under fiscal constraints because of large tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations, Governor Snyder of Michigan decided among other cost saving measures to switch Flint’s water supply from clean glacial Lake Huron to the polluted Flint River.  In spite of complaints about filthy water, the residents were told continually for over a year that it was OK to use. But, within a few months after the switch to Flint River water, GM complained that the water was corroding car parts being washed on the assembly line.  Governor Snyder spent $440,000 to hook GM back up to Lake Huron water but continued to poison the entire Flint population, refusing to spend a mere $9000 to seal the pipes to stop the corrosive water from leaching lead into it. We must fight for and build socialism and destroy capitalism before it destroys us.

***
The truth behind the 2008 financial crisis is all exposed in “The Big Short.” This movie shows that the big banks knew what they were doing. Some pretty savvy investors proved it. And the US government, including the President and the Congress, went ahead and paid off the criminal banks anyway to the tune of over $1.5 trillion of our hard earned taxes. “The Big Short,” movie and book, clearly lays out how the big banks put together risky unsustainable financial packages and sold them to investors. Both the big banks and the investors then made billions of dollars. When the whole house of cards collapsed, the 99% lost jobs, homes, pensions, and social services while the “too big to fail” banks and insurance companies were bailed out with our tax money! The 99% need to be running the government not the 1%!

***
Serious debate is taking place in the U.S. today about whether or not young women aged 18 to 25 should be required to register for Selective Service just like young U.S. men are so required. Now that the Department of Defense has lifted its ban on women in combat, top military commanders have recommended that women be required to register for Selective Service. Former U.S. Army helicopter pilot Amber Smith was quoted as supporting this recommendation, saying “That’s what equality looks like.” (TheFederalist.com)

But if we want real equality in the USA and the world today, we should oppose the recruitment of young men and young women into the “voluntary” military or registered to be subjected to a military draft to fight imperialist wars. This U.S. military machine is fighting against equality, against the interests of workers and oppressed within the USA and around the world.

***
The United States now has the highest rate of infant mortality in the advanced capitalist countries, higher than any of the other 27 “developed countries,” according to a 2014 report of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). By contrast, in spite of suffering under a brutal U.S. imperialist-led economic boycott for more than half a century, tiny Cuba with its focus on free universal education and health care has a lower infant mortality rate than the USA. In addition, the U.S. is one of only eight countries in the world, including war-torn Afghanistan, where maternal mortality related to childbirth is on the rise!

***
A climate disaster has been unfolding in Aliso Canyon near Los Angeles, since October, 2015. A monstrous methane leak from a SoCal Gas Co facility, has spilled more than 84 metric tons of methane into our atmosphere. That’s like burning 800 million gallons of gasoline. It is the largest methane leak in U.S. history.

Methane is more than 80 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over two decades. More than 2,500 residents of the adjacent Porter Ranch community have been forced from their homes, and two schools have shut down. Children and other residents exposed to high levels of benzene, have suffered headaches, nausea, and nosebleeds. California Governor Brown declared a state of emergency in October. In mid February, the company said that they have intercepted the leak to send it to another relief well preventing more gas from flowing out. Would you take the word of a company that said they couldn’t get it fixed until the spring of 2016, maybe?

We the people need to mobilize and demand that Congress and the EPA implement strong laws. Moreover, as working people we need to band together within the USA and worldwide, to fight for this planet. This is the only home we have. Say it Loud and Say it Proud: I’m Not Going to take it anymore!








Revolutionary Organization of Labor (ROL), USA is a revolutionary working class organization that fights for working class power and the elimination of all human exploitation. Ray O’ Light Newsletter is the regular publication of ROL, USA. We believe, with comrade Lenin, that the working class “… needs the truth and there is nothing so harmful to its cause as plausible, respectable petty bourgeois lies.” In the spirit of Karl Marx who taught that “our theory is not a dogma but a guide to action,” we welcome your comments.

Comradely the Newsletter Staff,

Ray Light, Editor            Rose Brown, Assistant Editor                   Carl Pappos, Production Coordinator


Boxholder,   607 Boylston St.,   Lower Level Box 464,   Boston, MA  02116  USA

Sunday, March 13, 2016

WHEN AN ACTIVIST FALLS THROUGH THE CRACKS: AN INTERVIEW WITH JODDA MITCHELL by Jack Balkwill

Jodda Mitchell is an activist who lives in Arkansas, surrounded by people who hate her for her beliefs in feminism, peace, a clean environment, social justice and other progressive causes.  She's carried on her activism despite a threat that she's losing her home and may be evicted if she doesn't get help soon.  I interviewed her this week.

Jack:  What do you consider to be the most important thing currently happening for activists to address?

Jodda: Despite the grinding poverty in my own life, and the general poverty I observe in this part of Arkansas, my main concern is ending wars for corporate profit. Given the tremendous impact on our national budget, the horrific effect on the environment, and the injury, starvation, loss of life, and displacement of victims of US aggression, it's easy to conclude that every other Leftist cause is affected by war.

If you support women's rights, keep in mind that wars kill women. LGBT people are killed in wars. Animals are killed in wars. Corporations feed on wars.  Wars enrich the 1% tremendously. Wars consume money that could be spent on health care, education, infrastructure, and social programs.
If you vote for pro-war candidates, you vote against everything the Left stands for, including the working class which is sent to kill and die for the enrichment of the 1%. There is no way around this. There is no way to mitigate it other than to take a stand against war.
War is the stinking, blood-soaked, raging psychopathic elephant in the room that liberals continue to ignore at the expense of all that is good in the world.

Jack:  Are you supporting a candidate for president this year?

Jodda:  Yes. I have been voting for Green Party candidates since the 2000 election, and I will vote for Dr. Jill Stein this November. Unlike the corporate-owned candidates, Jill Stein is completely opposed to wars for profit, and is 100% supportive of the working class. In addition to supporting free college, she also supports elimination of all current student debt. I love the plans in her Green New Deal.  http://www.jill2016.com/plan


Jack:  How are you doing on keeping your house?

Jodda:  We are constantly threatened with foreclosure. We have applied for a loan modification several times now, only to be turned down because Kenny's income from Walmart is too low.

Jack:  Are you doing anything new to attempt to bring in income?
Jodda:  Yes, two things. I have been an astrologer for more than 25 years and have started giving readings for a fee. Through an analysis of your unique natal planetary placements and aspects, I can help you find your life's path, discover any current astrological influences, and can help you determine if particular love interest is the right person for you.
You can find my astrology service here:

https://www.facebook.com/Drops-of-Jupiter-Astrology-Service-269962756516353/

I am also an excellent genealogist. I am very affordable, and my customers love my work, judging by the reviews on my business page.

Recent research has shown a positive psychological influence occurs when we think about our ancestors. I also believe everyone should know their family origins. It provides a grounding effect, and can make one feel a part of something much bigger than self.

(research here:) http://digest.bps.org.uk/2010/12/benefits-of-thinking-about-your.html

My page is here:

https://www.facebook.com/Genealogy-Finding-Your-Kith-and-Kin-in-History-996167740394499/

Jack:  I'm aware that you rescue animals and wonder if you can share why you do it?

Jodda:  I do it because I have to. I simply cannot see an animal abandoned alongside the road without stopping to help. Given the elevated poverty rate in the area, many people don't spay and neuter their pets and the unwanted litters end up dumped on the highway. There are no animal control services in this area, no one to call for help.
At times, the most I can offer is a meal and a drink of water, so I always carry dog and cat food, water, a leash and collar, and a pet carrier in my car. Nearly all of these animals are terrified and I am unable to catch them, so I do the best I can by putting out food and water. Now and then, I find one who is brave enough to come to me, or one who is injured and can't run away. These are the ones who become family! 


There are also colonies of feral cats I feed each night, sallying forth through all sorts of weather to provide a meal. When possible, I trap them and have them spayed and neutered and get them a rabies shot.

My mother impressed on me from a very early age that it is our duty to help those less fortunate. "As ye do unto the least of these", "Entertaining angels unawares", "A defense for the helpless, a defense for the needy in distress"–those are three of the more than three hundred Bible verses commanding us to make tending those in need a major theme of our lives, and it is how I was raised. Incredible woman, my mother, and I'm so glad to have had such a powerful social justice warrior in charge of my upbringing.

Jack:  How did you get so behind on your mortgage payments that you were threatened with foreclosure?

Jodda:  When we purchased this home, my partner of the past 14 years, Kenny, had a well-paid factory job. He had been at this job for 5 years when he inadvertently violated a safety rule and was fired. He was unable to collect unemployment, and it took several months for him to find another job. We live in a very small town, and the only other job available is at Walmart, where he has worked for the past 2 years, earning less than half what he made at the factory. We have applied for loan modifications, but we keep getting turned down because Kenny's income is so low.
I have always fought for the poor and homeless, and now as I'm falling through the cracks in the system I realize this could happen to anyone. There are no jobs that pay a living wage around here, and we are a step away from homelessness.


Jack Balkwill has been published from the little read Rectangle, magazine of the English Honor Society, to the (then) millions of readers USA Today and many progressive publications/web sites such as Z Magazine, In These Times, Counterpunch, This Can't Be Happening, Intrepid Report, and Dissident Voice.  He is author of An Attack on the National Security State, about peace activists in prison.

What if Hitchcock got it all backwards in 'The Birds?' | Mickey Z.

"The Birds" trailer screenshot. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons."The Birds" trailer screenshot. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
Mickey Z. -- World News Trust

March 13, 2016

I recently revisited a 2011 study involving crows that proved -- yet again -- how humans are the only species supercilious enough to be astonished when another species performs "advanced cognitive tasks." (Humans, for that matter, are also the only ones arrogant enough to believe "advanced cognitive tasks" could and should remain constant from species to species.)

The study "found" (among other things) that crows "remember the faces of threatening humans and often react by scolding and bringing in others to mob the perceived miscreant."
Perceived? Only a human would insert that qualifier when myriad aspects of modern miscreant, I mean, human behavior -- e.g. habitat fragmentation and environmental toxins -- present a clear and present threat to global bird populations. Here are a few examples:

Windows: In the United States, between 365 million and 988 million birds are killed each year by collisions with plate glass windows in tall buildings.

Automobile Culture: Some 60 million to 80 million birds are killed each year by motor vehicles (and it’s likely impossible to calculate how many are lost during the endless construction of carchitecture. 

Domestic Cats: Feline companions allowed to roam free may kill as many as 4 billion birds per year in the continental U.S. alone.  

Factory Farming: Worldwide, more than 50 billion chickens are raised and slaughtered annually. Every day, 23 million chickens are killed in the United States for food. That's 269 dead chickens per second.

Communication Towers: Whether they are radio-transmission or cell phone towers, the annual avian death rate is roughly 7 million. However, high tension line collisions are believed to be far more common, with perhaps 174 million fatalities annually.  

Pesticides: Estimates are as high as 72 million deaths per year. 
For those of you scoring at home, that's billions and billions of birds killed annually by humans and human-related behavior while time and money is funneled into specious, phallocentric experiments to discover what should already be apparent to all. 

This astounding disconnect is the root of so many current problems. The natural world, seen as inferior, goes conveniently misunderstood as humanity's necrophilic "progress" cuts a broad swath through our shared eco-systems. In such a scenario, denial and justification become crucial. 
Breaking this pattern of denial and justification sure sounds like an "advanced cognitive task” to me. Any bets on whether a certain miscreant species is up to handling it?

Mickey Z. is the author of 13 books, most recently Occupy these Photos: NYC Activism Through a Radical Lens. Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, you can “like” his Facebook page here and follow his blog here.

THE FUTURE DOESN'T LIKE YOU by ANTHONY FREDA

The future is place where people will believe that giving up their liberty will help fight terror and save the Earth.
(It will do neither)

The future is a place where your every move will be recorded, tracked and analyzed without you even knowing it.
(Because They-hate-your-freedumb)

The future is a place where your car will drive itself with the promise of giving you more freedom and autonomy.
(You will lose both)

The future is a place where "humanitarian" wars will continue to destroy millions of human lives and fuel terror.
(To keep you safe)

The future is a place where your neighborhood police will look and act like soldiers on a battlefield.
(To protect and serve)

The future is a place where drugs, media and technology will used respectively to keep you sedated, misinformed and distracted from the fact that
The Future Doesn't Like You.
 
 

Stipulated: War is a Lie (SOAPBOX PODCAST 3/13/16)

CINDY SHEEHAN'S SOAPBOX
MARCH 13, 2016






GUEST: DAVID SWANSON
TOPIC: WAR IS A LIE

This week, on the Soapbox, Cindy chats with Soapbox friend, David Swanson about the 2nd edition of his book: War is a Lie.

Please click on the book image for more information and links.

http://davidswanson.org/warisalie

Sunday, March 6, 2016

Destroying a dam is terrorism (except when it isn’t) | Mickey Z.

Eder Dam on 17 May 1943. Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-C0212-0043-012 / CC-BY-SA 3.0 , via Wikimedia CommonsEder Dam on 17 May 1943. Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-C0212-0043-012 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Mickey Z. -- World News Trust

March 6, 2016

The title of a March 3, 2016, article definitely baited me to click: “1.5 Million May Die if Mosul Dam Fails: Iraq Expert.” From that article: 

“The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad said a collapse of the dam in the north of country would be ‘serious and unprecedented.’ Some 500,000 and 1.47 million Iraqis would ‘probably would not survive’ the wave, while water could reach depths of 45 feet in the nearby city of Mosul, it said in a statement.”

Even a skeptic could easily imagine how Iraq’s failing infrastructure included its dams. But what if I reminded you that Mosul is an ISIS stronghold? And what if I added that U.S. and Iraqi forces have been planning a massive joint attack on ISIS in Mosul?
Before you answer those two questions, let’s learn a little about dams.
Dam Nation
 
The U.S. government tells us: “Dams provide a range of economic, environmental, and social benefits, including recreation, flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, waste management, river navigation, and wildlife habitat.”

But Jacques Leslie, author of Deep Water: The Epic Struggle over Dams, Displaced People, and the Environment, paints a different picture: “The world's dams have shifted so much weight that geophysicists believe they have slightly altered the speed of the earth's rotation, the tilt of its axis, and the shape of its gravitational field.”

More than 45,000 large dams (read: at least 45 feet high) were built in the 20th century and these structures impact all life on earth. In California alone, dams have resulted in the loss of 90 percent of that state's river environment and 95 percent of the salmon and steelhead habitat -- all at a cost 50 times higher than more efficient solutions. And here's more:

1. Dams cause greenhouse gas emissions
 
According to a study done by the National Institute for Space Research, India's 4,500 dams (third highest behind the United States and China) "emit an amount of methane that is equivalent to 850 million tons of carbon dioxide per year." It seems both carbon dioxide and methane are "released from the decaying vegetation of spillways, reservoirs and turbines of hydropower dams, but methane is twenty-three times more formidable in trapping heat than carbon dioxide."

2. Dams displace people
 
As many as 80 million people have been displaced by dams worldwide. This is due to the reservoir created by the dam. In addition, those who live downstream from the dam will no longer have the dynamic river ecosystem that created their environment in the first place. 

3. Dams promote erosion
 
The folks at International Rivers explain that dams hold back sediments that would naturally replenish downstream ecosystems. "When a river is deprived of its sediment load, it seeks to recapture it by eroding the downstream river bed and banks, undermining bridges and other riverbank structures," they continue. "Riverbeds downstream of dams are typically eroded by several meters within the decade of first closing a dam; the damage can extend for tens or even hundreds of kilometers below a dam."

4. Dams lead to plant and animal extinctions
 
The introduction of such an unnatural structure quite predictably has led to the extinction of many fish and other aquatic species, the disappearance of birds in floodplains, and massive losses of forest, wetlands, and farmland.

Bearing all this in mind, it should come as no surprise that some eco-activists have contemplated the demolition of dams. It should also come as no surprise that such musings are deemed “terrorism” by the powers-that-be. What might come as a surprise to some is that those same powers-that-be have absolutely no problem blowing up a dam… if it serves their interests.

“Starvation and slow death”
 
During World War II, British scientists invented a spinning cylindrical “dam buster bomb” specifically to demolish German dams. Less than a decade later, the U.S. Air Force (USAF) bombed the Toksan Dam (among others) in order to flood North Korea’s rice farms. Here’s how the USAF justified such tactics: “To the Communists the smashing of the dams meant primarily the destruction of their chief sustenance -- rice. The Westerner can little conceive the awesome meaning that the loss of this staple food commodity has for an Asian -- starvation and slow death.”

Fast-forward to the U.S. assault on Southeast Asia: In a now-declassified memorandum dated April 15, 1969, popular evangelist Billy Graham urged President Richard Nixon to blow up dikes which “could overnight destroy the economy of North Vietnam.” Even without Rev. Graham’s heavenly sanction, U.S. bombing of dikes in South Vietnam was already a common and uncontroversial tactic.

Fast-forward even further to modern-day Iraq: ISIS, which has replaced Osama as Public Enemy #1 (during a presidential election year, no less), rules Mosul and there just so happens to be a crumbling dam nearby.

Reminder: Destroying a dam is terrorism… except when it isn’t.

Mickey Z. is the author of 13 books, most recently Occupy these Photos: NYC Activism Through a Radical Lens. Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, you can “like” his Facebook page here and follow his blog here.
Creative Commons License
"Destroying a dam is terrorism (except when it isn’t)" by Mickey Z. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://worldnewstrust.com/destroying-a-dam-is-terrorism-except-when-it-isn-t-mickey-z.
  • Created
    Sunday, 06 March 2016
  • Last modified
    Sunday, 06 March 2016

Advertisement

Subscribe

Drug Lords of the CIA (SOAPBOX PODCAST 3/6/16)









 MARCH 6, 2016





GUEST: BOB KIRKCONNELL

TOPIC: CIA DRUG AND ARMS DEALING

***********************************************************************************


CLICK FOR BOOK ORDERING INFO
ABOUT THE BOOK:

The shocking story of how seeds of destruction were sown into the foundations of America at the very beginning. How did slavery come about in the "land of the free" How did a native population of over eighteen million dwindle down to two hundred thousand? How did the American dream of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, turn into the American nightmare we have now of racism, genocide, and war? Who assassinated JFK, how, and why? How do drugs come into the country, and who is behind it? Other startling questions are explored here: Why were thousands of the Nazi Germany's worst war criminals given refuge in the U.S. Who really financed Hitler? Where did Hitler get his "master race" and genocidal ideas from? Was Lee Harvey Oswald a C.I.A. agent? Were Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVey, and the "Peoples Temple" CIA mind control subjects? What really happened in the Jeffery MacDonald, "Fatal Vision" case? You will get the real story behind these and many others disturbing questions right here!


BOB KIRKCONNELL AMERICAN HEART OF DARKNESS RADIO



ABOUT THE GUEST:

Bob Kirkconnell was in Vietnam from February, 1968 to August, 1969 and provided airlift support for American combat troops during the siege of Khe Sanh, the battle of Hue, and the battle of the A Shau Valley. He received a Bronze Star with combat "V" for heroism during the second Tet offensive in February, 1969, while attached to the Korean Tiger Division, Qui Nhon, Republic of Vietnam. Later he was a logistics systems analyst investigating fraudulent travel on military aircraft, and he planned and organized Joint Chiefs of Staff directed Air Assault Training exercises. He started writing about some of his experiences that were at odds with U.S. stated objectives in 1998 which led to his first book.
 

He is married to Leila (Majaj) Kirkconnell and their children are Lynley, Marcy, and Brian. They also have six Grandchildren and four Great Grandchildren. Bob is now retired and Leila teaches high school special education. Activist groups they belong to include: Metis Nation of the South, Veterans for Peace, Academics for Justice, Jewish Voice for Peace, Union of Concerned Scientists, the American Civil Liberties Union, Green Peace, the Wilderness Society, Amnesty International, and many others. Leila and Bob have participated in many demonstrations opposing the current invasions and occupations in the Middle East. Further,they have authored hundreds of Op-Eds, and they have also written government officials hundreds of times.

Fascism as Usual in Turkey, Fascism of a New Type in the USA by Muhsin Y.
















Fascism as Usual in Turkey, Fascism of a New Type in the USA
by Muhsin Y.

The world media is abuzz with news of the fascist Turkish state's seizure of the newspaper Zaman. For years, internal conflicts among the ruling elite in Turkey have caused similar aggressive moves by the perpetually victorious ErdoÄŸan faction (still ruling under its AKP government, despite having to resort to restarting the war in Kurdistan to preserve its power after the June elections of last year).
Liberal commentators, whether pro-Moscow or pro-Washington, view this as evidence of "emerging" "fascism" or "dictatorship" in Turkey. Those of us with a deeper knowledge of Turkey know better: Turkey has been a fascist dictatorship since at least the 1980 coup led by Kenan Evren, and backed by US imperialism.
The Turkish state, which takes journalists into custody for "insulting" prominent government figures, which murdered Hrant Dink in the street through a still-uninvestigated conspiracy, which still denies the Kurdish people their national rights even while it wages a war of collective punishment against them for voting the "wrong" way in a supposedly "free" election, is apparently at risk of being declared undemocratic!
Turkey has not been a bourgeois democracy for a long time. Turkey is a fascist state, and real opposition figures risk their safety and indeed their very lives by speaking the truth about its history and functioning now as then.
This does not mean, however, that we have nothing to notice in the latest move by the Turkish state. The AKP government faces a real threat from the left, with the progressive HDP (an umbrella party which represents the Kurdish Liberation Movement and various socialist and democratic trends) having pushed them out of government in the June elections. The AKP is nervous, because it knows its castle (or Erdoğan's massive presidential palace, newly built at tremendous public expense) is built on sand. In such a context, other right-wing players have attempted to attack the AKP to seize power for themselves. It was mere months ago that Can Dündar's Cumhuriyet newspaper made the risky decision (as a mainstream news source) to reveal what the left and Kurdish movement in Turkey have known all along: That the Turkish state under AKP control had been aiding ISIS against the Kurdish movement in Syria.
In the case of Zaman, however, the power-hungry maneuvering is quite clear for all to see: Behind Zaman lies the power of the anti-communist cleric Fethullah Gülen, who lives in Pennsylvania under the apparent protection of the US state whose clients in Turkey originally recruited him as part of their plot to use reactionary religious sentiment against the threat of communism. As various power-sharing disagreements drove a more and more significant wedge between Gülen and Erdoğan, now Gülen's supporters pose as champions of "democracy" and cry that the constitution has been suspended. But it is under this same constitution that the Turkish state covered up for the murders of Armenians and Alevis, throwing out investigations, and it was under this same constitution that the Turkish state trampled on the national rights of the Kurdish people, imprisoning their children for the "crime" of throwing stones at the heavily armored police vehicles that patrol their streets as an occupying force! Where were the tears of the constantly teary-eyed Fethullah Gülen for dead Alevis and imprisoned Kurdish children?

And where is the US, the protector of democracy around the world, now? Will it declare Turkey to be a fascist dictatorship? Why would it, when it accepted, defended, and funded the implementation of the fascist coup order in 1980?
No, Zaman readers, expect no such protection from "the free world" that gave sold chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein to gas the Kurdish people in Iraq, that denied he commit such crimes against "his own people" (!), only turning on him when he got into a fight with the Kuwaiti monarchy.
Besides, the Americans have their own problems: While it may be that Donald Trump cannot win the presidency, he has already opened up a dangerous space for fascists in the US. Americans may claim "it can't happen here", because they have been raised on a fairy tale of bourgeois democracy being in conflict with fascism.
In fact, the history upon which this fairy tale is based is WWII, when it was the forces of the socialist world which dealt the decisive blow against Nazi fascism. The role played by the bourgeois democracies was not nothing, but it is worth asking: Did they fight Nazi fascism because bourgeois democracy and fascism are irreconcilable? If such tactical alliances were based on deep principle, they would be hard-pressed to explain their alliance with the Soviet Union. And the United States built fascist dictatorship after fascist dictatorship around the world in the post-war era to protect its imperial hegemony against the "threat' of the Soviet Union! The war between the imperialist camp and Nazi Fascism was simply a war for redivision of world power, just as one observed in WWI between various imperial powers, none of them more democratic than the others.
We Marxist-Leninists do NOT understand fascism as something OUTSIDE of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie represented in some "pure" bourgeois democratic form. Bourgeois democracy is the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie WHEN it rules (more or less) with consent and some basic respect to some basic rights of dissenters (their safety etc.). Fascism emerges when this "nice" order is not practical for the ruling elite. In Turkey, there is never any real guarantee of the freedom and safety of real dissenters against the (US-backed) coup-imposed order. In the US there still is. Thus we say that the US is still a bourgeois democracy (internally, although there is a question about which parts of internationally recognised US territory might be considered colonial holdings, on which the law is always different from in the "core" territory). However, the emergence of trends like Trump show that it can indeed happen here. The KKK and other "white nationalists" are rejoicing with the news that their views are now acceptable in (a part of) the mainstream. If rule by consent is no longer practical, the reader will look back to the Trump candidacy as a qualitative change whereby fascist trends (always extent within US bourgeois democracy) emerged and began their takeover.

But when that happens, we must not become nostalgic, and think that the emergence of full fascism in the US is a "betrayal" of wholesome US bourgeois democracy. This bourgeois democracy was always the rule of the bourgeois class which would similarly reap the rewards of open fascist rule. If fascism emerges in the US, it will only be a defence mechanism of the real rulers of the United States against an increasingly ungovernable day to day.
Just as it was in Turkey.


Saturday, March 5, 2016

Cindy Sheehan in Chelsea, Mass for Celebration of International Working Womens Day

ON THE 13TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE US-LED INVASION OF IRAQ:
 
Jeanette Rankin in 1917
 
 
 JOIN THE CHELSEA COMMUNITY CELEBRATION OF INTERNATIONAL WORKING WOMEN’S DAY
 
WITH FAMED “PEACE MOM” CINDY SHEEHAN
 
Cindy, 2009 in Martha's Vineyard

 
 
 
SUNDAY, MARCH 20, 2016
STARTING AT 2PM
 
ROCA YOUTH CENTER
101 PARK STREET
CHELSEA, MA 02150
 
(On 111 Bus line from Haymarket station -- Open Parking Lot on Pearl Street behind ROCA Building)
 
Sponsored by Chelsea Uniting Against the War/
Chelsea Uniéndose en Contra de la Guerra
 
For more information, call 617-889-2841 or 617-840-3892

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

My Psychopath is Better than Yours by Anthony Freda

Our only choice may be between a corrupt, mendacious war criminal and a seemingly unhinged egomaniac.

We will have no other options. We are prisoners to the divide-and-conquer duopoly.

Not voting, or voting for a sane candidate from a third party is insane.

Voting for power-mad psychopaths is perfectly rational.

Why throw your vote away on a "loser" when you can use it to help elect a despot?

One candidate helped lie us into the Iraq War and build the police state, and the other sprang from her legacy of chaos and failure like a mutated creature spawned in a fallout zone.

Both are intent on imposing their twisted agendas upon the world, backed up by the staggering might of empire, but 

"My devil is not as evil as yours"

This is the suicidal, national consensus born of mass narcissism, mutual paranoia and communal hypocrisy posing as pragmatism.

POPULAR POSTS