Monday, May 9, 2016

Thank you, Andrea Dworkin | Mickey Z.




“Only when manhood is dead -- and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it -- only then will we know what it is to be free.” (Andrea Dworkin)

As someone who eschewed college and instead embarked on a long journey of dedicated radical self-education, I find it quite illuminating that it took so damn long for me to finally encounter the work of Andrea Dworkin

The “Left” often talks of dissidents being marginalized but I easily and naturally happened upon Noam Chomsky, Assata Shakur, Howard Zinn, Guy Debord, Frantz Fanon, Arundhati Roy, Edward Said, Angela Davis, Emma Goldman, Ward Churchill, bell hooks, and far too many others to name here. Meanwhile, I didn’t read Dworkin’s Heartbreak: The Political Memoir of a Feminist Militant until 2015 -- and it just so happens to be the most revolutionary book I’ve ever read. (This is not to say I agree with everything she’s ever written so please don’t pull that tired old straw man from your tired old bag of tricks.)

It’s hardly a coincidence that none of my subversive cohorts ever recommended a feminist pioneer like Dworkin to me during the past decade or two. The more I read of her work and the more I listen to her blunt analysis, the more I comprehend why she's been either erased or demonized -- by the mainstream and right wingers, of course, but also just as vehemently by the denizens of the so-called Left. Regardless of one’s alleged political beliefs, patriarchy still rules the day. 

“The common erotic project of destroying women makes it possible for men to unite into a brotherhood; this project is the only firm and trustworthy groundwork for cooperation among males and all male bonding is based on it.” (Andrea Dworkin)

In a more general sense, it’s illustrative to witness the palpable discomfort caused by my endless evolution. But then again, perhaps friendships based on shared ideology are more often than not doomed.

All that said, please allow me to be clear: I am (at best) a work-in-progress and I deeply lament how long it’s taken me to better understand the foundational power of patriarchy. I think back with profound regret on some of the stances I’ve held, the publications and websites for which I’ve written, the movements I’ve trusted, the opinions I’ve shouted from stages all across the country, the former comrades I’ve defended, and the books I’ve authored (I’d seriously like to edit or erase all 13 of ‘em!). 

I feel shame, but not surrender. I'm fueled by an intense desire to make up for lost time and commit myself more than ever to identifying and rejecting the conditioning that’s shaped/warped me. To tear down, as Miss Andrea exhorts, what needs to be torn down.

I have a long, long way to go and will undoubtedly falter but, regardless, I will continue to do my best to live up to the standards I’ve detailed here and the standards that courageous visionaries like Dworkin have established. I can finally see that since everything females do to resist patriarchy has been pornified, commodified, weaponized, and used against them, the change must begin with us men. 

As I’ve written before, if men want to live up to self-anointed labels like activist, revolutionary, radical, ally, and comrade, the path is clear. We are required to do almost all of the initial work and make (by far) the biggest changes and commitments. If we care about justice and liberation as much as we claim we do, now is the time to look in the mirror, to call ourselves out, to check our egos and our masculinity programming at the door, and to make what appear to be major sacrifices (pro tip: they’re not). We men must name the problem, over and over again, until we stop being the problem and stop passing on the problem to the next generation.

“Men who want to support women in our struggle for freedom and justice should understand that it is not terrifically important to us that they learn to cry; it is important to us that they stop the crimes of violence against us.” (Andrea Dworkin)

Postscript: For anyone seeking to experience the transformative work of Andrea Dworkin, I’d humbly suggest you start with the aforementioned memoir. Also, you’ll find PDFs of all her books here and many audios here. Lastly (for now), this 47-minute documentary is essential viewing (trigger warning for survivors of sexual abuse). 

“If you know what it is that needs to be torn down, tear it down.” (Andrea Dworkin)

Mickey Z. can be found here.

Creative Commons License
Thank you, Andrea Dworkin by Mickey Z. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://worldnewstrust.com/thank-you-andrea-dworkin-mickey-z.

4 comments:

  1. Some people think human beings have a problem. Others think they are the problem. The lingering toxic ethical foundation of "original sin" — there Calvinist, here "radical feminist" — it remains despairing and fatalistic, of predeterminism and categorical self-hatred.

    You want to destroy "manhood" and see it as "patriarchy"?

    Fine. But where patriarchy actually means something (father right) and where human beings are the subject, not the object (socialism) — we can actually change the world, and ourselves, without the endless ulcer of misanthropy.

    Heartbreak is a profoundly powerful book. Blunt, and where it is so simple, so wrong. Where the end is that "patriarchy" is an intrinsic, ahistorical and onotological reality of "male privilege" and female acquiescence — that's the same worldview as the most backward patriarchal revanchist.

    Truth: you own no woman, Mickey Z. And the women all around you are free to do this or do that, be mothers or workers or both. And this idea that love, mutual aid, caring and so on are just the lies the patriarchy tells us?

    It's philosophically akin to saying "all humans are guilty and cruel" for eating chickens and other food. It sees the very act of being human as just another way of seeing that "original sin."

    And in that there is no hope. In that it literally doesn't matter what any man or woman does. In that is the longing for another excuse to separate the clean from the unclean and conflate politics with moral hygiene.

    So, if another round of self-flagellation and blame-casting is what's in store — enjoy that miserable wallowing in "patriarchy" and the relief from the (entirely reasonable) idea that we are what we do, not the worst that has been done to us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shame. That feeling of shame. Why the shame, why not just become a Calvinist and be done with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, Jed Brandt - five-star general of the straw man army - has taken time out from fomenting "political revolution" to continue stalking me, as if our verbose opinions matter or ever mattered. As the cool kids might say: LMFAO.

      I have an idea, Comrade Jed, instead of following me around on comments threads, why not crowdfund another of your super-effective and influential "peoples newspapers"? That never fails!

      Delete
  3. "and where human beings are the subject, not the object (socialism)"
    Love it!
    Thanks, Jed B.

    ReplyDelete

Any comment that does not include death threats, threats of harm, or name-calling will be approved.