“From
the very concept of strategic bombing, all the developments -- night,
pattern, saturation, area, indiscriminate -- have led straight to Hiroshima, and Hiroshima was, and was intended to be, almost pure Schrecklichkeit [terror bombing].”
- Life magazine, summing up Allied bombing tactics (August 1945)
At 11 o’clock on
the morning of Aug. 9, 1945, Prime Minister Kintaro Suzuki told the
Japanese Cabinet that Japan’s “only alternative” was to accept the
Allied peace terms and “terminate the war.”
Minutes later, the Home of the Brave™ dropped a second atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Nagasaki.
Afterwards,
novelist Zora Neale Hurston, called Truman a “monster,” adding, “I can
think of him as nothing else but the Butcher of Asia,” and even U.S.
Admiral William D. Leahy characterized the atom bombs as “an inhuman
weapon to use on a people that was already defeated and ready to
surrender.”
If the Hiroshima bombing was pure Schrecklichkeit, who then could explain the purpose of bombing Nagasaki three days later?
Here are the thoughts of three historians who have tried:
“The
psychological effect on Stalin was twofold,” proposed Charles L. Mee,
Jr. “The Americans had not only used a doomsday machine; they had used
it when, as Stalin knew, it was not militarily necessary. It was this
last chilling fact that doubtless made the greatest impression on the
Russians.”
“The dropping of
the second bomb on Nagasaki seems to have been scheduled in advance and
no one has ever explained why it was dropped,” wrote Howard Zinn. “Was
it because this was a plutonium bomb whereas the Hiroshima bomb was a
uranium bomb? Were the dead and irradiated of Nagasaki victim of a
scientific experiment?”
“Humanity had been forced to witness enormous destruction all through World War II,” declared Michael C.C. Adams, in The Best War Ever: America and World War II.
“By 1945, the killing had reached such enormous proportions that the
bombing of one more city did not have the aspect of moral horror that it
might have now. In such a time of death, the unimaginable had become
acceptable.”
Indeed, the nuclear floodgates were wide open…
Shortly after
the devastation of Nagasaki, researchers set about -- at any cost -- to
discern the effects of plutonium on the human body. “In experiments
worthy of Dr. Mengele,” wrote Jack Bradigan Spula in Lies of Our Times, “these researchers chose unwitting patients who were not expected to live long anyway.”
“There were two
kinds of experiments,” wrote Peter Montague, director of the
Environmental Research Foundation. “In one kind, specific small groups
(African-American prisoners, mentally retarded children, and others)
were induced, by money or by verbal subterfuge, to submit to irradiation
of one kind or another. In all, some 800 individuals participated in
these ‘guinea pig’ trials. In the second kind, large civilian
populations were exposed to intentional releases of radioactive isotopes
into the atmosphere.”
These vile
experiments cannot genuinely be dismissed as a momentary lapse amidst a
well-intentioned, post-war paranoia: The declassified documents on U.S.
radiation experiments stretch three miles long.
Reminder: The men -- and yes, it’s always men… it’s Male Pattern Violence -- responsible for this radioactive rampage are commonly referred to as this country’s “greatest generation.”
Never forget, comrades, this is what we’re up against.
Mickey Z. is the author of 12 books, most recently Occupy this Book: Mickey Z. on Activism. Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, he can be found on the Web here and here. Anyone wishing to support his activist efforts can do so by making a donation here.
"Nagasaki: The Unimaginable Had Become Acceptable" by Mickey Z. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://worldnewstrust.com/nagasaki-the-unimaginable-had-become-acceptable-mickey-z.
-
Created
Tuesday, 04 August 2015 -
Last modified
Tuesday, 04 August 2015
Copyright © 2015 World News Trust. All Rights Reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please limit your comments to the content of the posts---not your self-perceived, self-righteous, personal opinions of the authors/activists who post at this blog. Personal attacks, or threats of violence will not be posted....moderator.