Tuesday, January 12, 2016

ROL, USA NEWSLETTER #94 (January-February 2016)


RAY O’ LIGHT NEWSLETTER                            
January-February  2016    Number 94
 
Publication of the Revolutionary Organization of Labor, USA




A Revolutionary Approach to the Sanders
Presidential Campaign
by RAY LIGHT


“Engels is most definite in calling universal suffrage an instrument of bourgeois rule. Universal suffrage, he says, … is the ‘gauge of the maturity of the working class. It cannot and never will be anything more in the present-day state.’” (Cited by Lenin in The State and Revolution)

The 2016 U.S. Presidential Race thus far reflects the bitter experience of the working class, the urban and rural poor, and the middle class with the capitalist austerity for the 99% and the almost unprecedented boom years for Wall Street and finance capital. This assault on our conditions of life has been provided by the bipartisan “Republicrats” under Republican President George W. Bush and Democratic President Barack Obama since the economic crisis hit in 2007 and 2008.

Under the banner of “universal suffrage,” the TV debates, polls, rallies, and constant media coverage have revealed that there is remarkably little support for the “Republicrat” “2016 heavy favorites” (mainstream Democratic and Republican candidates, Hillary Clinton and especially Jeb Bush). Instead, the strong showing of right wing, fascistic Tea Party candidates such as Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Cruz, Rubio et al. on the Republican side and the social-democrat Sanders on the Democratic side reflects some level of popular mass rejection of “Republicrat Rule” and the Wall Street imperialist ruling class they represent.

Many of the ruined privileged petty bourgeoisie especially the white supremacist, great nation chauvinist, and Christian fundamentalist among them) are backing Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Cruz or Rubio and have helped these candidates attract large numbers of (especially white) impoverished workers and the poor. This campaign is accelerating the already formidable fascist direction in which the USA has been going for some time now — especially during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama years. It is a disturbing and dangerous development.

On the other hand, large numbers of lower middle class and working class folks who have also experienced increasing economic hardship are supporting Bernie Sanders. This has been shown by the huge numbers of people that have attended a Sanders Rally and/or donated to his campaign, dwarfing the numbers for other presidential candidates. The Sanders campaign is mobilizing this mass support in spite of the pro-imperialist, pro-Wall Street national AFL-CIO and NAACP misleadership with their early endorsement of arch imperialist and Wall Street puppet Hillary Clinton. As 2016 begins, only three national unions have endorsed Sanders — National Nurses United, American Postal Workers Union (APWU) and the Communications Workers of America (CWA). Yet these three unions, with their Sanders endorsement and progressive leadership, do not represent any significant break with the treacherous AFL-CIO leadership, such as had occurred in the 1930’s in the split between the stagnant, top-down AFL bureaucracy and the then new and rising, emerging democratic mass-oriented CIO, with its large Communist Party influence. Moreover, Sanders’ commitment ahead of time to support Clinton or Biden or whatever imperialist war criminal the Democratic Party ultimately picks as its candidate sharply diminishes the extent to which the Sanders Campaign represents any real alternative to the “Republicrats” and to the Tea Party.

After six decades of U.S. imperialist hegemony in the world capitalist camp, a period that witnessed the dismantling of the international communist movement and the demise of the socialist camp, the U.S. sector of the international working class remains largely isolated from the rest of the class. It is still politically overwhelmed by its immediate and direct bourgeois enemy, U.S. imperialism. This still powerful global force, the U.S. Empire, as the main bastion of international capitalism, continues to draw its strength from its international connections, from the oppression of the world’s peoples.

This unequal conflict between U.S. labor and U.S. capital is reflected, among other things, in the lack of a revolutionary working class vanguard party in the USA today. Furthermore, there seems to be no short term prospect for the re-establishment of proletarian international solidarity among the rest of the international working class and especially with the U.S. workers such as existed in the days of the Soviet-led Communist International. 

Nevertheless, the U.S. Empire is itself in rapid decline, a factor that provides renewed opportunities for the advance of the proletarian revolutionary cause in the USA.

In the Presidential Campaign thus far, the Sanders For President Campaign is helping to educate the working  class and oppressed nationalities and the poor that they are entitled to a better life, after decades in which most of the workers and the 99% have bought Wall Street’s idea that the problems in the USA are due to the workers receiving more than they deserve! (The Democratic Party and its AFL-CIO Labor Lieutenants, NAACP misleaders, etc. claim that “the middle class” needs and deserves more but not the increasing masses of poor people and the working class.)

At the same time, the Sanders Campaign makes concrete positive mass demands on the U.S. imperialist ruling class. Single payer universal health care, $15/hr minimum wage, defense of the public good, i.e. free public college tuition, public schools and public post office, etc. Most or all of this Campaign’s demands had already been identified by the Revolutionary Organization of Labor (ROL-USA) as worthwhile goals of the class struggle around which we are trying to mobilize the working class and the masses. Both within and in conjunction with the Sanders Campaign we can now continue and deepen the political struggle around these demands.

Trump and the other Republican tea party candidates are moving U.S. society rapidly and decisively toward fascism (Trump’s anti-Latino immigrant bashing, Fiorina’s spearhead of an anti-women campaign, the Carson-led anti-Muslim immigrant hysteria). On a positive note, however, the Sanders Campaign is moving a segment of the U.S. populace toward opposition to Wall Street rule.

Can the weak and isolated revolutionary working class forces in the USA today afford to stand outside the fray and refuse to critically support the Sanders campaign’s half-hearted and fatally compromised defense of the petty bourgeoisie, the workers and the poor?  Half-hearted and fatally compromised because Sanders himself remains wedded and committed to the Democratic Party wing of the “Republicrat”party of Wall Street and U.S. imperialism and to defense of the U.S. Empire.

Remember the guidance of our boldest leader, comrade Lenin, — we need to make political compromises and alliances. But these maneuvers can only advance the proletarian revolutionary cause if we implement a principled policy using both “unity with and struggle against” our temporary allies. For example, Lenin observed: “The Bolsheviks … since 1905 have systematically insisted on an  alliance between the working class and the peasantry against the liberal bourgeoisie and tsardom, never, however, refusing to support the bourgeoisie against tsardom (for instance during second ballots) and never ceasing their relentless ideological and political struggle against the bourgeois-revolutionary peasant party, the ‘Socialist-Revolutionaries,’ exposing them as petty-bourgeois democrats who falsely masqueraded as Socialists.”

Following the Bolshevik example, we can endorse the Sanders petty bourgeois democratic domestic platform, while ceaselessly opposing and exposing his criminal support for the U.S. Empire with its continuous imperialist war and oppression of the peoples of the world. In order to have successful (pro-revolutionary) united front work with the Sanders Campaign, however, it is crucial that we remain constantly mindful that Sanders is no better than “the extreme left wing of the imperialist bourgeoisie” and that we have a constant duty to educate the workers and oppressed within the USA and around the world of that fact.

In a section of Ray O’Light Newsletter #59 (March-April 2010) entitled, “Obama and the Federal Government Preside Over the U.S. Empire in Decline” we opened with the following sentence: “Barack Obama is well suited for the difficult task of presiding over an orderly march of the U.S. population to impoverishment in the desperate effort of the U.S. monopoly capitalist and imperialist ruling class to save itself and its hegemonic position in the world capitalist system.”

After elaborating how, in the face of the Obama bailout of Wall Street, the Obama-Biden Democratic Administration had seduced much of the U.S. “left,” the Afro-American people, Latino immigrant workers, and the organized section of the U.S. working class under AFL-CIO leadership, we concluded that: “This march to impoverishment, however, is still only in its beginning stages. And the challenge to the U.S. monopoly capitalist and imperialist ruling class and President Obama to lead the masses of working people and oppressed nationalities in the USA to poverty without us opting for revolt, without us turning to socialist revolution  for the way out of our difficulties, will only get more difficult.”

Since we made the above observation, the more than five years of bitter experience of the 99% of the U.S. population on our backward march to austerity, under the leadership of the Obama Regime and U.S. imperialism, is the concrete material basis for the strength of the Sanders Campaign that has surprised everyone – including Sanders. In this light it is clear that a section among “the 99%,” among the U.S. workers, the oppressed nationalities and petty bourgeoisie, are beginning to turn “to socialist revolution as the way out of our difficulties.” This helps explain why Sanders raises the need for a “political revolution,” despite having already committed himself to support the nominee of the Democratic wing of the imperialist ruling party, the “Republicrats.”

The Sanders Campaign represents a step, though a small one, by thousands of U.S. workers and of the 99%, including some youth, toward open “revolt,” toward “socialist revolution.” ROL-USA and the handful of other proletarian revolutionaries in the USA have a responsibility to help the class and the masses to continue on this revolutionary path to workers power and socialism.


************************************************************************************



May The Force Awaken
by CINDY SHEEHAN


“Listen, I can’t get involved. I’ve got work to do. It’s not that I like the Empire; I hate it. But there’s nothing I can do about it right now... It’s all such a long way from here.”
   –Luke Skywalker in Star Wars


Prelude

Psychologist, Robert Jay Lifton, who is a pioneer in the study of what drives otherwise “normal” human beings to commit war crimes calls war: “an atrocity-producing situation.” Atrocities have been committed in every war since the beginning of time, and the sad thing is the barbarity hasn’t decreased. Recently a US soldier tried to justify to me committing atrocities because the “British did it to the Native Americans” in the French-Indian War. This soldier was essentially agreeing with Lifton.

Since war is an atrocity in the first place, war crimes will be committed, period. In many of my speeches soon after Casey was killed, I used to call war “a failure of imagination.” Now I know that’s crap — war is imagined by and for the war machine and gladly perpetrated by its toady elected officials and promoted by its toady media. War is not “failure” in this Empire — war is inevitable.

World Wars and Emperors

 
The UN recently admitted that the world is technically in a World War because of the number of countries involved in the Middle East fighting US/Israel-created ISIS (and all of its permutations and uneasy alliances). I am constantly and consistently upset with the Empire’s genocidal foreign policy, but I can’t decide what upsets me more — the genocidal foreign policy or the fact that most of my fellow USAins are sheep who blindly follow (or not follow) the Emperor in the Oval Office depending on whether that person has a (D) or an (R) behind his name. Expressing “him” is not sexist in this case, because it’s always been a “him” so far; however, the US may be getting an Empress soon, but she is as much of an Imperialist warmonger as the next guy and will be no better in terms of peace and social justice.

Imperial Stormtroopers

 The inevitability of war would not be possible without toady media or toady politicians or without the Cult of (Storm)Troop Worship. And what about this Cult of Troop Worship? Even the antiwar movement is so careful to not criticize anything The Troops™ do. We are constantly admonished to “hate the war, but love the warrior.” I am sorry, but I don’t even like that word, “warrior.” It implies that our children join the military to commit war crimes, but we all know that most of our children join for education benefits, or health insurance because of all the insidious crimes against the masses, the fact that we have so little options vis a vis education or jobs is perhaps the worst. “Warrior” also implies that we live in a War State — which we do — but the antiwar movement does not have to use the nomenclature of The Empire. Most of us teach our children the difference between right and wrong, but when our young people become The Troops™ they receive a thorough brainwashing and get sent off to murder members of their own class and species who are not their enemies. Our children become hired goons for imperial greed — more like victims of a system that neglects everyone’s essential needs, than heroes.

The Force Tosses and Turns

 This past year, with the support of many organizations, (including ROL,USA), Cindy Sheehan’s Soapbox organized one of the only anti-war events in Washington, DC called “Spring Rising: An antiwar intervention.” The turnout and energy were less than spectacular, but I in no way believe that was the fault of the organizers or our very principled demands and activities — the lukewarm energy was mostly due to the fact that most people who would come out in support of antiwar events identify with the Democratic Party and if a Democrat is spiraling the world into war, then it’s probably best for them to just stay asleep until a Republican is doing the same thing.

The Wrong Force?

 For those of you living in a cave, there is a new installment of the Star Wars saga in theaters now called, The Force Awakens. I have not seen it, but I know that an Evil Empire cruelly dominates some galactic space-scape and in the series, Luke Skywalker has transformed from the attitude of the Joe USA-ian to be a badass Jedi Knight because his family was slaughtered. Isn’t it ironic that many of our fellow workers go to these movies to cheer on rebellious behavior, but oppose any effort to end the Empire of the US? Also, how many people identify with the radicalization of Luke Skywalker, but not with the radicalization of Arabs who are literally being driven to oppose the US Storm troopers in their own countries?

The Force Votes
 
In my opinion, it would be best to … hit the masses that attend these campaign events [during presidential election season] with a little dose of our “Ray-o-light” Sabers and be relentless in hammering the Empire with our fundamental opposition to Imperialism every chance we get.

May the force (power of the masses) of truth, justice, and rebellion awaken in reality this year and may we continue to be courageously in the thick of it.





***********************************************************************************

Connecting the Dots: 

U.S.-led Military Intervention in Afghanistan, Opium-Poppy Production, and the Opioid-Heroin Epidemic in the USA
by ROSE BROWN


In 2007, the total estimated world production of heroin reached 75.2 tons of which 82% was consumed in the USA! By 2010, an estimated 122.5 tons was manufactured.Opium-poppy production and distribution in Afghanistan today provides more than 90% of the global supply of opium from which heroin is produced.

According to the Christian Science Monitor, “The opium capital of the world, Afghanistan … produces about $4 billion worth, or 53 percent of gross domestic product, making drug production easily Afghanistan’s most lucrative industry, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (“Afghanistan’s soaring drug trade hits home,” 3/13/2008)

By 2001, the Taliban government of Afghanistan had virtually eliminated opium-poppy production there. In fact, in August of 2001, the U.S. government gave the Taliban government a grant of 43 million dollars which was announced by Secretary of State Colin Powell in recognition of the Taliban’s efforts in wiping out the main source of the world supply of heroin. (See “Bush’s Global Terrorist War and the September 11th Events,” Ray O’ Light Newsletter #29, November, 2001)

However, within weeks, beginning on October 7, 2001, U.S. imperialism, behind the smokescreen of 9-11, launched its criminal U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. As U.S. (and NATO) troops spread across the country and the Taliban was removed from power, poppy cultivation and opium production was resumed once again.TeleSur reported this year that “The production of opium increased 40-fold in the 13 years of the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan …” (http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/US-to-Blame-for-Spike-in-Opium-Production-in-Afghanistan-20150416-0028.html)

In a Counterpunch article in November 2012, Mike Whitney pointed out: “The Pentagon reversed [the elimination of poppy production in Afghanistan] by installing the same bloodthirsty warlords who had been in power before the Taliban. Naturally, this collection of psychopaths – who the western media lauded as the ‘Northern Alliance’ – picked up where they left off and resumed their drug operations boosting their own wealth and power by many orders of magnitude while meeting the near-insatiable demand for heroin in capitals across Europe and America.” 

When Obama assumed the U.S. presidency in 2009, his administration not only continued the Bush-led imperialist war against Afghanistan but augmented it with a “surge” of additional troops. Part of the BIG LIE rationale of the Obama Administration was that in addition to fighting “terrorism” in Afghanistan, the U.S. government was leading the fight against “drug trafficking.” Reportedly, the U.S. government spent $7.6 billion in an effort to reduce the production of poppy. The result? “Poppy production was at an all-time high of 209,000 hectares last year, it grows in numerous parts of the country where it once did not and U.S. officials blame Afghanistan’s government for failing to stop it. … About half of all poppy production in Afghanistan occurred in Helmand, where thousands of additional U.S. Marines deployed as part of President Obama’s surge of troops ordered in late 2009.” (The Washington Post, 10/21/14)

The truth is that this opium-poppy production in Afghanistan is in the interests of U.S. imperialism. For one thing, according to the March 2015 report of the U.S. Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, an estimated 2 million of the 33 million Afghan people are opiate users and Afghanistan has the largest population of juvenile opium addicts in the world.  It is much easier for U.S. imperialism to control a drugged population and thus the resources of its country than an alert and organized population defending its rights and national sovereignty.

In the Counterpunch article cited above, Whitney noted that the production and trafficking of narcotics in Afghanistan helps the U.S. achieve its goal there “to pacify the public, to maintain the loyalty of the warlords, and to open the country to resource extraction and military bases. As long as the warlords get their payola, the U.S. is able to maintain some control over the hinterland beyond Kabul, which is a big part of the game plan.”

Opium-poppy production in U.S. imperialist-controlled Afghanistan has also wreaked havoc here in the USA. According to a Los Angeles Times Report (9/11/13) more than 12 million people abuse opioid drugs in the USA and 16,652 deaths in 2010 were related to opioid overdoses. At a time of prolonged economic crisis and growing impoverishment of the U.S. masses, the large inexpensive supply of heroin flowing from Afghanistan has significantly contributed to these deaths and drug abuse.

The U.S. opioid-heroin epidemic has been aggravated by the big pharmaceutical industry’s pushing of highly addictive prescription opioids, especially oxycontin (synthetic heroin) in the last decade. This has resulted in tremendous profits for Big Pharma and mass opioid addiction among the 99%. Many U.S. patients who are prescribed oxycontin by a doctor become addicted. Because heroin is more readily available and less expensive than oxycontin in many areas, former patients turn to heroin as a substitute for oxycontin and end up dying of accidental heroin overdoses.

Connect the Dots – If the U.S. population had not supported the U.S. imperialist-led invasion of Afghanistan, millions of people in both Afghanistan and the USA today would not be addicted to heroin. By supporting the U.S. troop invasion of Afghanistan, the working people and oppressed nationalities of the U.S. were supporting our own worst enemy, the U.S. imperialist government which has been attacking our standard of living, our social benefits and our civil liberties here at home while laying the basis for the heroin-opioid epidemic in the USA today.

Let’s fight for a better life for ourselves and the majority of the world’s people!

Oppose U.S. imperialist war!

***********************************************************************************

Still stumped?! See answer below to mystery quotation above.


Mumia Abu-Jamal, the famed Black radio journalist, known as the “Voice of the Voiceless,” has been imprisoned for the past 34 years under the false allegation that he killed a Philadelphia cop. For anyone serious about defending and enforcing that “Black Lives Matter,” Mumia, in many ways was among “the first on the scene” and the most insistent and uncompromising.

The mystery quote is from a brief 2014 essay entitled, “The Historic Role of Journalism Among Black People.” It appears in a 2015 book of his selected prison writings entitled, “Writing on the Wall.” Arguably there is no person in the USA today who has more integrity than Mumia. In an article entitled “Mumia Abu-Jamal and the U.S. Presidential Election” published back in November of 1999, I wrote: “When people of the caliber of Mumia Abu-Jamal can become President of the USA, it will be a much better world.”

Today, still imprisoned, Mumia is fighting for his health and life in order to be able to keep on keeping on serving us. We can send letters of support and donations on behalf of Mumia to P.O. Box 411074, San Francisco, CA 94141 or email support to prisonradio@gmail.com

      —the Editor




**********************************************************************************






Revolutionary Organization of Labor (ROL), USA is a revolutionary working class organization that fights for working class power and the elimination of all human exploitation. Ray O’ Light Newsletter is the regular publication of ROL, USA. We believe, with comrade Lenin, that the working class “… needs the truth and there is nothing so harmful to its cause as plausible, respectable petty bourgeois lies.” In the spirit of Karl Marx who taught that “our theory is not a dogma but a guide to action,” we welcome your comments.

Comradely the Newsletter Staff,

Ray Light, Editor            Rose Brown, Assistant Editor        Carl Pappos, Production Coordinator


Boxholder,   607 Boylston St.,   Lower Level Box 464,   Boston, MA  02116  USA











Sunday, January 10, 2016

What if plants have feelings, too? | Mickey Z.

Credit: Ryan McGuireCredit: Ryan McGuire

Mickey Z. -- World News Trust

Jan. 8, 2016

Just because I’ve chosen a plant-centered diet for more than two decades doesn’t mean I’m unable to entertain other perspectives. In fact, I truly enjoy having my foundational beliefs, um, disrupted. So, when I encountered this video about the “vegan-ness” of bi-valves, I was both curious and intrigued. 

Of course, it didn’t take more than a matter of seconds to find plenty of animal whites types ready to declare (from on-high) that bi-valves are officially “off limits.” None other than Darth Vegan himself, Gary Yourofsky, laid down this simple edict: “Clams and mussels and oysters are not plants.”

Not plants. The universal vegan criteria. 

Because plants are different from non-human animals, right? Plants don’t communicate or remember or bond, right? Plant never feel pain or fear, right? Animals are a lot like us but plants, not so much… right?

What was that I said about disrupting foundational beliefs?

The Secret Life of Plants 
 
By using the same experimental framework normally applied to test learnt behavioral responses in animals, biologists from Australia and Italy have “successfully demonstrated that Mimosa pudica -- an exotic herb native to South America and Central America -- can learn and remember just as well as it would be expected of animals.
Another study revealed “a potentially new form of plant communication, one that allows them to share an extraordinary amount of genetic information with one another.”

This is but a tiny sampling of the growing evidence that plants have a far richer inner life than most humans are willing or able to recognize. Hell, even some of the tiniest organisms on the planet (bacteria) have their own version of instant messaging

When I read stories like these, I am neither surprised nor threatened. Are you? 

Life and Death
 
What would it mean if vegans were to collectively agree there’s much more to plant life than they’re willing to admit? What’s the downside of embracing the likelihood that plants feel a version of fear and pain which remains outside current human perception? What’s so bad about leaving oneself open to the probability that plants very much want to live and therefore suffer when their lives are taken? 

Could you live in peace accepting that any cycle of life must include death?

Such a sea change in outlook and openness would free vegans from the restrictive mindset of a) believing they’ve cornered the market on compassion and b) viewing all non-vegans as murderers (or at least, accomplices to murder). To eschew the purity pissing contest would enable far more humans -- from bacon fetishists to Francione fetishists -- to work together against a powerful common enemy: factory farming and the capitalist culture that created it.

Reminder: Life becomes far more livable and activism far more active once we accept that going vegan is merely one small, potential step in a far bigger journey -- a step not everyone can, will, or must take in order to contribute to the manifestation of drastic and sustainable social change.
#shifthappens

Mickey Z. is the author of 13 books, most recently Occupy these Photos: NYC Activism Through a Radical Lens. Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, you can “like” his Facebook page here and follow his blog here. Anyone wishing to support his activist efforts can do so by making a donation here.

Creative Commons License
 
"What if plants have feelings, too?" by Mickey Z. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://worldnewstrust.com/what-if-plants-have-feelings-too-mickey-z.

The Death of the American Dream by Dakotah Lilly


 

America has the highest prison population in the world, according to author William Blum in his book “Rogue State." 

Jerry Dewayne Williams was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for stealing a slice of pizza under California’s three strikes law. This is not a nation that provides anybody with opportunity for anything besides failure. Millions of Americans are feeling the crunch of free market American economic policies. 2008 was the beginning of the subprime mortgage meltdown. One would be hard pressed to find an American not affected by the economic crisis. 

People lost their jobs, homes, and economic security, while wages are still stagnant or decreasing, union membership is at an all-time low and poverty has been rising. All of this in the wealthiest nation on earth. Sales of designer and luxury goods are skyrocketing, while more and more people are unemployed. Student loan debt now surpasses credit card debt as the largest source of debt in America. People say that college and hard work are essential to the American Dream, yet the United States has no form of a universal pre-k or university system. 32 million Americans are illiterate. America has failed all of these people--Capitalism has failed all of these people. The American dream is no longer an attainable goal, but a fairy tale.
 

America, known as the home of the free locks up more people than any other country on earth. The majority of these arrests are for non-violent offenses. In F. Scott Fitzgeralds famous book The Great Gatsby some of New York's wealthiest individuals are shown committing the most heinous of crimes, yet none of them actually face any legal repercussions. Speaking of two rich individuals in the book, the character Nick Carroway said it best “they were careless people, they smashed up things and creatures and retreated back into their money." Imagine if a person of color or a person who was not rich had committed the same crimes as the fabulously rich. That is not the American dream--that is not the American way: a two-tiered justice system: one for the rich and one for everybody else, goes against everything we are taught to believe in about the American dream. It also shows just how unattainable the American dream is. If a middle class person is found guilty of possession of marijuana three times, in some states they may face 25 years to life in prison. The American dream for these people is literally impossible, as it is for the vast majority of Americans. 

Minorities are especially excluded from the so called “opportunities” some argue are still available in attaining the American dream. Americas history is unfortunately a shameful one.


Since recorded history in the 1400s Spanish conquistadors enslaved Native Americans and killed millions. Now replace the words “Spanish Conquistadores” and “Native Americans” with “the rich” and “the workers of America." 

In 1997 10% of black males in their 20s were in jail, compared to 1% of white male. Studies show that black males are thirteen times more likely to be given longer and harsher sentences than white males for drug related offenses. 77% of all executions in Maryland since 1923 were of African Americans. The average black American has an annual income that is 61% less than the average white income--this is the same percentage as in 1880 (Kenneth Anderson 2003). The statistics are no better for Latino and Latina populations. Yes this is in the so called “land of the free” where there is supposed “liberty and justice for all."

Unfortunately the buck doesn’t stop there: 494 of the top fortune 500 companies in America are owned by men. On average American women make $650,133 less in a lifetime than the average man. The US also has more recorded rapes than any other industrialized nation (Kenneth Anderson 2003). These are not things to be proud of. Faced with these facts nobody could still logically claim the American dream is still possible in America (If it ever was--Editor). Even for the whitest, manliest and most christian man, the American dream is still unattainable.
 


Dana Gioia’s poem “Money”, is an excellent example of consumerism in America. “To be made of it, to have it!” The poem sounds as if it were written by Lloyd Blankfein himself, and that is not a good thing. Money controls peoples lives in America, but not for the reasons you may think. When comparing the years 1979 with 2001, the rich saw their wages skyrocket by 157%, while those in the bottom 20% saw their wages decrease when adjusted for inflation. As of 2000 the average CEO makes somewhere from 500-600 times more than their lowest paid worker (Kenneth Anderson 2003). Baseball players make hundreds of times more than teachers and scientists, those who educate and advance humanity. Please keep in mind the baseball player's actual contribution to humanity is, lets be honest, hitting a ball with a stick. What we have been seeing in America for decades and now at the worst point is “affirmative action for the rich." If you are rich, so will be your children, and your children's children; however the actual laborers of our nations children, will have to settle for cat food for Christmas dinner. That is not the American dream. 

The American dream is not allowing corporations to ship jobs overseas, it is not slaving away for $7.25 an hour, it is not being honored by paying those same corporation's taxes when they get a tax break. There are names for this type of system, they include oligarchy, plutocracy, kleptocracy, aristocracy, and fascism. Martin Espada noted in his poem “Who burns for the perfection of paper” of the toiling many people must go through to reach their dreams; however, currently no matter how hard you work success will always elude you. Many people believe that the idea of the American dream is nothing but a scheme to keep workers toiling away, harder and harder in pursuit of this dream. If you take everything into consideration its not far from the truth. Social mobility is at an all time low. Unfortunately, the large part, but perhaps not a majority of the American people, seem hoodwinked into believing that the solutions to these problems is more division and more of the same problems that got us into this mess of an oligarchy. 

Those in government continue to cut taxes on the wealthiest Americans, cut services for the poor and middle class which help spur social mobility, and the American people continue to vote for tweedledee and tweedledum at the ballot box hoping to find a revolution that many Americans feel we need a form of. However, the American people can only be fooled for so long, and there is hope that a storm is coming and a radical change of values and social structure is coming along with it. Hopefully this is the case. 

Dakotah Lilly is a 17 year old radical gay socialist who lives in PA. Lilly is the leader of Lehigh Valley Youth Democratic Socialists. Dakotah's first mass action was joining Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox and other organizations in March in WDC for Spring Rising; in his spare time he likes smashing patriarchy, imperialism, capitalism and defending the oppressed.

Although, not a self-identified anarchist, Dakotah Lilly is helping to organize
a left wing anarchist action known as Mid-Atlantic Anarchist Collective MAAC,

Saturday, January 9, 2016

Brother Larry vs The Lame Duck (SOAPBOX PODCAST 1/10/16)

The Soapbox
JANUARY 10, 2016 





Guest: Brother Larry Pinkney
Topic: Typical Hypocrisy and Crimes of US Empire

This week, Cindy chats with Brother Larry Pinkney who has been "Keeping it Real" on the Soapbox now for a full presidential tenure---eight years!



Every year, about this time, our dear friend Larry comes on to discuss the former and future crimes of the Creatures in office (particularly Obama) with a nod this year to the Creatures running to take Obama's place as Head CEO of USA Murder, Inc.

Here is a list of Soapbox archival shows with Brother Larry--the prophetic voice of the people!


http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/search/


Keeping it Real

****************************************************
Brother Larry Pinkney also wrote the foreword to
The Obama Files: Chronicles of an Award Winning War Criminal

http://cindysheehanssoapbox.blogspot.com/p/the-obama-files.html
CLICK FOR ORDERING INFO
 

Life With Cancer (Update on Dede) by Cindy Sheehan

Life With Cancer (Update on Dede Miller)
Cindy Sheehan

My last update on my sister Dede's battle with breast cancer was optimistically misleading, but not because I was intentionally being "Pollyanna-ish." In an appointment in mid-December, her oncologist told us that her recent PET (Positron Emission Tomography) showed that the only cancer remaining was in her breast (she has stage 4 metastatic cancer and some cancer had been detected in tissue around her lungs that was diagnosed as "adenocarcinoma" and her diagnosis was very serious). 

By the time we went to this appointment, Dede had been off of chemo for several weeks and her breast tumor (which at one point had been all but gone) was growing again, but her doctor sent us to see a surgeon for possible mastectomy anyway.

The surgeon was far from the optimist the medical oncologist was and said that her tumor was too large and too much surrounding skin was involved for surgery to be possible and since stage 4 cancer is "incurable" there is little reason for surgery other than wound care because it's not about getting rid of the cancer, but cancer management and prolonging life. The upshot is, Dede will begin another course of chemo beginning this week for an indefinite amount of time. Her oncologist said some people have been on chemo for 10 years in response to her question whether she would just have to be on chemo for the rest of her life.

We were disappointed, and I am not too proud to say that I am a little scared and even though Dede shows a very brave face to the world, I think she is, too. Her attitude is very positive, so I try to match hers. 

Even though living with a person with cancer is a roller-coaster ride of hope, false hope, terror, victory and defeat; after living with her diagnosis for nine months, now, sometimes life with cancer is very mundane. Except for her sparse hair (which is growing back) and the fact that she tires easily, you wouldn't even know Dede has cancer and that makes it easier and harder to cope with at the same time. 

I am sorry that my last missive about Dede was overly optimistic, but I believe her medical oncologist gave us false hope. It angers me, but I can't imagine telling a very kind person like Dede that her situation is not that great. During this process, I have had to re-evaluate my style. I am brutally honest, so I expect the same kind of honesty from people I deal with. A little sugar-coating is fine, but to me, false hope is deadly. However, Dede is the one with the disease and she prefers a little fudging with the facts to help her cope with coping with this invader. 

As sisters, our styles are different, but our goals are the same. Dede won't be able to move back to L.A. anytime soon to be with her beloved pets in her own home, but the most important thing is that she (we) beat this thing to restore her health to better than ever.

And there is real hope, not false hope. Beating the kind of breast cancer Dede has is uncommon, but not impossible; beating stage 4 cancer is also not impossible and we have been reading a great book called Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds by Kelly A. Turner, and I really believe that with the alternative things we are doing and with Dede's great attitude and reasons to live, she (we) can be cured. 

I have my sister in the next room, but I need and I'd like my peace-comrade back because so much ruckus needs to be raised against the evil empire that not only wages wars around the world, but has constantly waged wars against poor people here within the borders.

Even though my own relationship with the medical establishment is on rocky ground, I think the biggest thing I have learned so far in this struggle is that early detection is so important. Dede knew she had a thing growing on her breast, but due to lack of medical opportunities and her own relentless denial ("if I ignore it, it will go away") she is in far worse shape that was necessary. We can't look back in regret, but we can analyze past circumstances to learn.

If I am overly optimistic, it is in my own hard work and agency. I really believed that by now the wars in the Middle East would be over---LOL. I've had many friends with breast cancer that were in remission by now and I really thought that's where we would be with Dede at this point. It's been a long haul but we still have a long haul to go.

Below is a link to Dede's GoFundMe page if you are interested in helping us with this life and death struggle. This is the mundane part of cancer, bills still need to be paid and even though Dede has a great team up here in Solano County with Medi-Cal, she still has expenses for her alternative treatments.

Thanks---as Ché said, "hasta la victoria, siempre."

HELP WITH DEDE'S MEDICAL COSTS




Monday, January 4, 2016

Whence Maoism? (Part 2: China’s Revolution, the Three Worlds Theory, and Revisionism) (GUEST BLOG)

Whence Maoism? (Part 2: China’s Revolution, the Three Worlds Theory, and Revisionism)

by Muhsin Y. 

Inspired by the revolutionary success of Marxism-Leninism in the Russian empire, Chinese comrades formed a CP. Mao made a name for himself throughout the party’s history, rising up through its ranks due to his indisputably masterful strategy and tactics. The proof, as they say, is in the pudding: Mao’s leadership toppled the fascist Chiang Kai-shek clique and brought the CPC to power. On this point, the “Maoists” focus on Mao is quite scientific: One should be interested in the ideas which, against all apparent odds, overturn the old order. This is the science of revolution, of which Mao and his experience certainly played a decisive role.

In its early years, the CPC formed the “left wing” of the KMT, the party which, at the time, was at the vanguard of revolutionary activity against the imperialist domination of China, which was aided by what “Maoists” famously call their “running dogs”, the comprador bourgeoisie and their lackeys.
J. Moufawad-Paul, whose blog is certainly one of the more interesting reads on the “Maoist” internet and who himself seems a very intelligent communist, summarises the role of the CPC in the KMT and declares that this teaches us that:
…entryism is not a very good tactic
It may well be that Mao himself agreed, in retrospect, with the idea that the CPC should’ve never “entered” the KMT, that it should have, without delay, launched a “people’s war” to turn China red. In other words, Sun Yat-sen should’ve been actively struggled against in the same way Chiang Kai-shek was. If this is indeed Mao’s view, it is a frightfully undialectical one. If Stalin was indeed mistaken in backing the CPC’s presence within the KMT (and consequently, backing the KMT), then Stalin should have declared Sun Yat-sen a “fascist”, the CPC should’ve waged active struggle against the KMT in spite of their tactical common interests against the imperialist threat, and of course, the civil war should’ve started years earlier, when the CPC was weaker and lacked the credibility it built up after years of honest effort in the struggle for national liberation within the KMT (with Sun Yat-sen’s blessing).

I hope to write an entry at a later time on “entryism” and how it is used and misused as a rhetorical device, but for now, it suffices to say that the CPC was a formidable force within the KMT in the years leading up to the Chinese Civil War. It gained strength through its legal operations which so impressed progressive nationalists like Sun Yat-sen that his wife Soong Ching-ling, sexistly known as Madame Sun Yat-sen, sided with the CPC when Chiang Kai-shek attempted to crush the communists after his fascist clique seized power. The legacy of the KMT for the CPC was certainly not all negative in the eyes of Mao, who continued to praise Sun Yat-sen as a revolutionary hero, and allowed non-fascist KMT elements to continue to operate legally in the PRC after its founding, where they remain to this day.

At this juncture, readers will forgive if I quote Stalin explaining dialectics to the anarchists:
Today we are demanding a democratic republic. Can we say that a democratic republic is good in all respects, or bad in all respects? No we cannot! Why? Because a democratic republic is good only in one respect: when it destroys the feudal system; but it is bad in another respect: when it strengthens the bourgeois system. Hence we say: in so far as the democratic republic destroys the feudal system it is good — and we fight for it; but in so far as it strengthens the bourgeois system it is bad — and we fight against it.
So the same democratic republic can be “good” and “bad” at the same time — it is “yes” and “no.”
 The same thing may be said about the eight-hour day, which is good and bad at the same time: “good” in so far as it strengthens the proletariat, and “bad” in so far as it strengthens the wage system.
It was facts of this kind that Engels had in mind when he characterised the dialectical method in the words we quoted above.
Things being always in motion, the KMT itself did change, and when this happened, Mao did indeed respond excellently, launching immediate guerrilla warfare, taking advantage of the poverty of the peasants, their considerable numbers, and the geographic advantages a peasant-based strategy represented to encircle the fascists. Mao’s actions were ingenious and heroic, and were exactly the response called for at the time.

A few years after the declaration of the People’s Republic, Comrade Stalin died, opening a new chapter in communist history. With Khrushchev’s rise to power, the dictatorship of the proletariat was declared obsolete, and the foundations for a profit-based economy were laid again. These changes were recognised by the Chinese and Albanian parties as “modern revisionism”, and the two countries became firm allies for a long period based on their shared commitment to upholding a strong Marxist-Leninist line.

unity
Best friends forever!
While in Albania, the party continued for decades to develop and put into practice Marxism-Leninism based on the blueprint provided by Comrade Stalin, in China, the path was different, and by design (something Maoists and Hoxhaites can agree on, the disagreement being whether this was a boldly independent and creative Marxist difference or a deviationist difference of some kind).
In private, Enver Hoxha was concerned about the gulf between China and Albania, but in public, he spent years heaping praise on Mao and China, something which has not gone unnoticed by the “Maoists”. But these disagreements were indeed there early. Chairman Mao flirted with Tito whilst condemning Khrushchev, an act which, even if excusable in the mind of the reader, certainly displays a massive gulf between Enver Hoxha and Chairman Mao, as the former bordered on fanaticism in his attacks on “the Titoites” (although it must also be mentioned that Mao publicly compared Tito to Bernstein, it seems that a different stance on who is a revolutionary Marxist-Leninist and who is a revisionist scoundrel depending on time and place was not a monopoly of the Albanian party).
In his fight with modern revisionism, Mao rightly concerned himself with enemies at home as well as abroad. In the process, we begin to see take shape the beginnings of a distinct “Maoist” approach. During the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, which included attacks on the “capitalist roaders” within the party, copies of the so-called “Little Red Book” (properly: Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung) were the text consulted by young revolutionaries in China, and Mao was in effect the interpreter of Marxism-Leninism (laying the foundations for the later emergence of an ideology of “Maoism” proper, as distinct from Marxism-Leninism). The text itself was compiled by the People’s Liberation Army, then under the leadership of Lin Biao, prior to his falling out with Mao).

The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, for its part, failed, and most self-declared “Maoists” today declare the People’s Republic of China to be “revisionist”. Many “Maoists” blame Deng Xiaoping for the current state of affairs, and view him as something of a Khrushchev to Mao’s Stalin. This may all well be true, but Mao Zedong himself seemed to have accepted this state of affairs by the end in a way that Stalin is not accused of doing, along with the “Three Worlds Theory”, a part of “Maoist” history that is not merely an incident, like so many in the history of Marxism-Leninism that can be brushed aside, but a theoretical point which led to differing interpretations of the core concepts of imperialism and social imperialism among various “Maoist” groups for years to come.

Assuming good faith with regard to Mao but an objective stance not based on attempting to find excuses for his line, I would draw two main conclusions from the internal experience of Mao’s China:
  1. Mao Zedong was a genuine struggler for socialism and against modern revisionism for some period, even if he seems to have surrendered near the end.
  2. The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, whatever its merits or shortcomings, had a similar effect to Stalin’s purges: It held back but could not prevent the victory of revisionism. China under Mao was no more successful in establishing an unshakable new socialist society than Albania or the Soviet Union, “losing its way” after “the great leader” passed on.
If true, the former point forces us to look at Mao as slightly less of an exemplary figure than Lenin or Stalin, much to the disappointment of our “Maoist” comrades. However, this would not necessarily make Mao the counter-revolutionary anti-Marxist that Enver Hoxha painted him as after the Sino-Albanian split. After all, we must consider Mao and China only as internal phenomena to be abstractly held up against the yardstick of Stalin’s Soviet Union or Enver Hoxha’s Albania, but in the correct context of the world revolution.

In the next part, I will examine Mao’s relationship with revolutionary movements around the world, past and present, and their relationship to Mao. This will involve some discussion of the concept of “people’s war”, without a doubt the most popular feature of Mao’s practice among communists and non-communists alike.

  READ "Whence Maoism, Part 1"

 

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Creatures of the Day by Cindy Sheehan

Creatures in Love 
(Bush and Pelosi--supposed enemies)

Creatures of the Day
Cindy Sheehan

crea·ture
ˈkrēCHər/
noun
noun: creature; plural noun: creatures

           *a fictional or imaginary being, typically a frightening one.
        "a creature from outer space"


Donald Trump is a scary creature who has been making some wildly fascistic statements particularly about Muslims and “illegal” immigrants on the campaign trail. In my opinion, he is a clown who is beneath contempt, but many Americans are flocking to his campaign, not because they love Trump, but because many of our fellow USAians are closed-minded bigots.

On the other side of the easily bamboozled, others are flocking away from his campaign to the creatures on the other side of the aisle because they must believe the hype: hype is what gives some hope. (“There’s a sucker born every minute”). Trump is being called “anti-American” for his statements, but Trump is unfortunately articulating the worst part of what it really means to be “American” in the tradition of the most abusive and violent Empire in human history. Maybe a class on what it REALLY means to be an “American” is in order?

If we lived in a just and compassionate society, Trump would be properly ostracized.


Obama is another a creature who not only walks free (as free as one can with a phalanx of over-armed security). Trump agitates hatred for Arab-Muslims, but Obama is a mass-murderer who has been responsible for murdering tens of thousands of them. Obama has dramatically increased the police state here in the US and no Demo-libs are calling him “fascist.”  Where is the tingle of intellectual inconsistency when Trump routinely is attacked for his statements about immigration after the Obama regime’s immigration policy has deported more immigrant workers and separated more families than any other president before him? There is no disconnect with Demo-libs because justification for Obama’s crimes has become an Olympic level training event for them.


Hillary Rodham Clinton is an imperialist warmonger with decades behind her of supporting war and economic terrorism around the world. As US Secretary of State, she out-war mongered the war mongers at the War Department. The only description that can be made of Clinton’s glee over the horrendous murder of Qaddafi in Libya is “euphoric cackling.” Many of Clinton’s supporters are in denial about her being the Head Demo-lib Cheerleader for the invasion of Iraq, but the proof is out there.



All of these creatures are just by-products of Imperialist-Capitalism and the problem with these periodic elections is that most voters here in the USA believe that the real issue is with personalities and not systemic oppression and propaganda.

What do we really believe is more influential in the sham of US elections?

A) Your 1/100 millionth of a vote?

B) Super-PAC money?

C) Propaganda?

D) Democracy delusions?

E) DNC Super-delegates/Electoral College?

F) The Supreme Court?

G) Corruptible voting machines?

If you answered “A” you’re incorrect—-if you answered “Everything but A” you’ are closer to the truth.

It is my opinion, which has been born out by history, that presidential elections, in particular, are major distractions and time/energy vampires of the working class. This is true especially when workers/voters do not organize to support candidates or issues that would actually benefit the working-class; instead rallying around creatures of the prevailing political establishment who are apparently there to demobilize the profound power of workers united.

Why do I call the political personalities of the “Demopublican” Party, “creatures?” Most people say, “Donald,” “Hillary,” “Bernie,” “Jeb,” or “George,” when referring to these creatures like they are our friends. For the most part, these people do not share or care about our values or what we need to not just survive, but thrive—they send our young to kill or be killed and then live their lives in the light of day. They don’t behave like humans with feelings or compassion—they behave like frightening beings, not from “outer-space,” but emerge from the capacity of the masses to believe the lies of the Empire. We are also taught to believe that the masses are not entitled to the peace and prosperity which the creatures enjoy at our expense.

Creatures of the day are shameless and deserve nothing but contempt and prison.









THE SOAPBOX TURNS SEVEN!! (SOAPBOX PODCAST 1/3/16)

CINDY SHEEHAN'S SOAPBOX
JANUARY 3, 2016


GUESTS: GRAHAM NASH

Congratulations to Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox for seven years on the air and in the streets!

We could never do it without the generous support of our loyal listeners!

Listen to the replay of our VERY FIRST SHOW (January 4th, 2009)! and stay tuned for many more in 2016...


CONTRIBUTE $7 (OR MULTIPLES) in HONOR of 7 YEARS!

http://cindysheehanssoapbox.blogspot.com/p/tax-deductible-donation.html






 

Saturday, January 2, 2016

Kissinger to Kurds: F*ck ‘em if they can’t take a joke! | Mickey Z.

Henry Kissinger - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2008. Copyright World Economic Forum (www.weforum.org) www.swiss-image.ch/Photo by Remy Steinegger. Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)Henry Kissinger - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2008. Copyright World Economic Forum (www.weforum.org) www.swiss-image.ch/Photo by Remy Steinegger. Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Mickey Z. -- World News Trust

Dec. 2, 2016

A Dec. 30, 2015, New York Times article bore the headline, “Turkey’s Campaign Against Kurdish Militants Takes Toll on Civilians.” It began:
A major Turkish military operation to eradicate Kurdish militants in Turkey’s restive southeast has turned dozens of urban districts into bloody battlefields, displacing hundreds of thousands of civilians and shattering hopes of reviving peace as an old war reaches its deadliest level in two decades.

The newspaper of record detailed the carnage but barely touched on historical context beyond: “The Kurds are a geographically dispersed minority whose aspirations for autonomy date back decades.”
Since the Kurds are the largest ethnic group in the world without their own country (a population as high as 40 million) and have often been used as geo-political pawns, it seems as good a time as any to remind readers how the Land of the Free™ and criminals like Henry Kissinger operate.

Missionary Position

In 1975, in the midst of a border dispute between Iraq and the Shah of Iran (major U.S. Ally), then-Secretary of State Kissinger secretly and manipulatively channeled $16 million in military aid to Iraqi Kurds. 

The Kurds succumbed to the spin, believing Washington was finally supporting their right to self-determination. In reality, the United States was using the Kurdish rebels to sap the resources of the Iraqi regime and coerce them into a settlement. 
That settlement came at the 1975 OPEC summit, at which time the United States promised Iraq that support for the Kurds would be immediately withdrawn. As Iraq subsequently wiped out the Kurdish rebels, Kurdish leader Mustafa Barzani sent a message to Kissinger. It read in part:

“Our movement and people are being destroyed in an unbelievable way, with silence from everyone. We feel, your excellency, that the United States has a moral and political responsibility towards our people, who have committed themselves to your country’s policy.” 

One can easily imagine Kissinger getting off on being called “your excellency,” while cringing at the concept of moral responsibility, but he did not directly reply to Barzani. Instead, he instructed a staff member: “Promise them anything, give them what they get, and fuck them if they can’t take a joke.”

When asked to explain America’s duplicity towards the Kurds, Kissinger delivered a one-liner that effectively sums up the perpetual purpose of phallocentric, necrophilic U.S. foreign policy: “Covert action should not be confused with missionary work.”

Let’s keep this in mind as we peruse this year’s corporate media headlines and listen to the latest candidate-criminals pontificate about their “plans” for tackling the “crisis in the Middle East.”

Mickey Z. is the author of 13 books, most recently Occupy these Photos: NYC Activism Through a Radical Lens. Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, you can “like” his Facebook page here and follow his blog here. Anyone wishing to support his activist efforts can do so by making a donation here.

Creative Commons License
"Kissinger to Kurds: F*ck ‘em if they can’t take a joke!" by Mickey Z. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

POPULAR POSTS